"Sliding Jigs vs Retraction Hooks for Maxillary Dentition Distalization Using IZC Miniscrews"

NCT07307209 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2026-05-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy, efficiency, and biomechanical differences between two methods for total maxillary dentition distalization: (1) the use of a Sliding Jig and (2) the use of Retraction Hooks, both anchored by Infrazygomatic Crest (IZC) miniscrews. The study will assess rates of distalization, anchorage loss, dentoalveolar tipping, patient comfort, and treatment-associated side effects.

Conditions

  • Skeletal Class II Malocclusion

Interventions

DEVICE

Sliding jig

participants in this group will undergo whole maxillary dentition distalization using Sliding Jig mechanics anchored by infrazygomatic crest (IZC) miniscrews.

DEVICE

retraction hooks

participants in this group will undergo whole maxillary dentition distalization using Retraction Hooks mechanics anchored by infrazygomatic crest (IZC) miniscrews.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sana'a University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Nagi H Alawdi, MSc. · Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University

  • Fuad Luft Almutareb, prf. · Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
14 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-02-11
Primary Completion
2026-03-15
Completion
2026-12-31

Countries

  • Yemen

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07307209 on ClinicalTrials.gov