MedTrace Logo

Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Pediatric Anesthesia

NCT03747250 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 501

Last updated 2021-03-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Videolaryngoscopy can lead to superior airway conditions and to the possible higher success compared to standard direct laryngoscopy. Patient will be randomized to the interventional group (videolaryngoscopy) and control group (direct laryngoscopy). The first attempt success rate, time to first end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) wave, overall success rate, incidence of aspiration, bradycardia, desaturation a overall complications will be monitored.

Conditions

  • Tracheal Intubation Morbidity

Interventions

DEVICE

Videolaryngoscopy

In experimental group (interventional group), patients will be intubated with the videolaryngoscope

DEVICE

Direct laryngoscopy

In control group (active comparator group), patients will be intubated with the direct laryngoscope

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Brno University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Petr Štourač, assoc.Prof.MD.Ph.D · KDAR FN Brno

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
29 Days
Max Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-01-01
Primary Completion
2021-01-01
Completion
2021-02-28

Countries

  • Czechia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03747250 on ClinicalTrials.gov