MedTrace Logo

King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope

NCT02324465 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2019-04-23

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The investigators plan to conduct a randomized trial comparing the intubation success rate and time of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope to the Glidescope video laryngoscope in order to demonstrate the comparability of the devices.

Conditions

  • Difficult Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

King Vision Video Laryngoscope

Intubation via King Vision Video Laryngoscope

DEVICE

Glidescope Video Laryngoscope

Intubation via Glidescope Video Laryngoscope

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Vanderbilt University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Douglas Hester, MD · Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-04-30
Primary Completion
2017-10-31
Completion
2017-10-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02324465 on ClinicalTrials.gov