Airtraq Versus Conventional Laryngoscopy in Children

NCT01212536 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2011-12-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators aim to compare the new paediatric Airtraq indirect optical laryngoscope with conventional direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in a randomised crossover study during routine anaesthesia. The investigators hypothesise that the Airtraq is as good as conventional laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation of infants and children. This will be an equivalence rather than a non-inferiority study.

Conditions

  • Children
  • General Anesthesia
  • Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

Airtraq laryngoscopy

laryngoscopy and intubation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Max Age
6 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-08-31
Primary Completion
2011-03-31
Completion
2011-03-31

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01212536 on ClinicalTrials.gov