MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Airtraq Versus MacIntosh Intubation Via Nasal Approach

NCT00847184 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2009-02-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Time, success rate, and number of optimising maneuvers for tracheal intubation via the nasal approach are not different when Aitraq technique is used compared to a standard MacIntosh blade.

Conditions

  • Tracheal Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

Intubation

Intubation using the standard MacIntosh blade

DEVICE

Airtraq

Intubation with the use of the Airtraq technique

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kliniken Essen-Mitte

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Harald Groeben, M.D. · Kliniken Essen-Mitte

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-02-28
Primary Completion
2009-11-30
Completion
2009-11-30

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00847184 on ClinicalTrials.gov