Clinical Evaluation of Teeth Prepared With Vertical Preparation Versus Deep Chamfer
NCT05252689 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2022-04-26
Summary
It has been demonstrated that a great amount of tooth structure is lost during the prosthetic preparations of abutments for full-coverage FDPs with tooth substance removal of 63% of 73%, this aggressive loss of tooth structure usually accompanied with pain and post-operative sensitivity. In comparison with the vertical preparation technique, there is less amount of tooth substance loss. this clinical study will provide benefits for practitioners and clinicians by guiding them to choose a more conservative treatment plan with the better marginal fit, clinical performance and satisfaction for the patients on the long term. rather than other benefits like less chair time, less risk for pulp injury, less time and cost
Conditions
- Single Posterior Crowns
- Endodontically Treated Teeth
- Decayed Teeth
Interventions
- OTHER
-
monolithic zirconia single posterior crowns with deep chamfer finish line
deep chamfer of 1 mm average thickness for cervical finish line, a convergence angle of 6-12° on each side and up to 20° total, in some studies, is acceptable and occlusal reduction of 1,5-2 mm
- OTHER
-
monolithic zirconia single posterior crowns with vertical finish line
using special round-ended 2 degrees tapered diamond burs a non-working tip (batt bur). It has coronal diameter of 1.2 mm, apical diameter of 0.7 mm, and non- cutting end of 1 mm, which reduces or avoids damage to the connective attachment and allows a tooth-guided preparation procedure
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Maha Taymour, PhD · Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2021-03-01
- Completion
- 2021-07-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Chewing Efficiency of Conventional Complete Denture in Comparison to Reinforced Poly Amide Denture
NCT03391063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Wear in Composite Resin and Reinforced Acrylic Denture Teeth Used in Complete Denture Construction for Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT04839640 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Relining Versus Digital Altered Cast Using Digitally Fabricated Distal Extension Frameworks
NCT06082609 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Dental Implant Stability Placed in Healed Bony Sites Using Oversized Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Protocol
NCT06917638 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on Esthetics
NCT03521024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Outcomes and Clinical Performance of Implant Supported Zirconia Crowns
NCT06417632 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Treatment of Worn Dentition With Innovative CAD-CAM Composites
NCT02828696 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Superstructure Material on Crestal Bone Resorption and Esthetic Outcome of Dental Implants
NCT02937220 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Partial Coverage Crowns Compared to Lithium Disilicate Partial Coverage Crowns
NCT02861729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bone Volume Changes in Immediate Implant Placement Using Allograft Versus Xenograft in Mandibular Molars
NCT06962878 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Monolithic Zirconia FPDs
NCT04879498 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Satisfaction and Adaptation After Elevation of Vertical Dimension of Occlusion Using Overlay Denture or Fixed Crowns
NCT03579134 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Single Implant Retained Partial Over-denture and Conventional Partial Denture
NCT03324789 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One-Tooth One-Time (1T1T) A Straightforward Approach to Replace Missing Teeth in the Posterior Region: a Case Series
NCT02898311 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Passive Fit of CAD/CAM Screw-retained Metal Frameworks Versus Screwmented Ones
NCT04372901 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Mini Implants Supported Over Dentures Versus Conventional Implant After Bone Expansion
NCT03326453 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Changes Around One-piece Zirconia(Zr) and Titanium(Ti) in Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06643975 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Different Healing Abutments in Single Posterior Implants
NCT06682559 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment Of Inlay Retained Bridge Designs (Tub Shaped And Inlay Shaped) In Missing Posterior Teeth Cases.
NCT03715842 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique
NCT06496828 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Marginal Bone Height Changes And Biting Force In Screw Retained Implant Prostheses Using Reinforced Resin Vs Monolithic Zirconium
NCT07007572 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Two Implant Prosthetic Pathways
NCT02905838 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention and Durability of the Anterior Zirconia Wing Bridge
NCT04378140 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Occlusion and Dis-Occlusion Time in Mandibular Overdentures Supported by Conventional Versus Mini- Dental Implants
NCT07256106 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA