Clinical Evaluation of Kerr SonicFill™ 2 vs 3M ESPE Filtek™ Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative
NCT03032705 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 51
Last updated 2021-12-13
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare esthetic, functional and biological properties of two restoration materials used to fill cavities. One material is called "Filtek™ Supreme" which is a traditional tooth colored resin composite that is placed in the cavity in layers and hardened with UV light. The second material is called "SonicFill™ 2," which is a bulk fill composite that uses an ultrasonic hand piece to change the material from a solid into a liquid in order to place it into the cavity. This material can be placed in the cavity in 1 layer, and is hardened using UV light. Both materials have been FDA approved as non-significant risk devices for filling cavities.
In each subject, one tooth with a cavity will be randomly selected to receive one filling material, and a second tooth with a cavity will be randomly selected to receive the second material. The fillings will be observed over a two year period to determine clinical acceptability.
Conditions
- Dental Caries
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
SonicFill™ 2
The intervention in arm 1 is SonicFill™ 2, a sonic-activated, bulk fill dental composite system for posterior restorations that requires no additional capping layer.
- DEVICE
-
Filtek™ Supreme
The intervention in arm 2 is Filtek™ Supreme Ultra, a Universal Nanocomposite dental restorative material that is visible-light activated and designed for use in anterior and posterior restorations of any class.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
KaVo Kerr
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Tufts University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Gerard Kugel, DMD, MS, PhD · TUSDM
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-06-19
- Primary Completion
- 2020-02-05
- Completion
- 2020-02-05
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
36-Month Clinical Performance of Different Restorative Materials in the Treatment of Root Caries Lesions
NCT03722758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Restorative Materials
NCT06109987 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
5-year Clinical Follow-up of Restorative Materials
NCT06393270 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Dentin Replacement Materials
NCT07320885 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Single Color Universal Composite Resin Restorative Materials.
NCT06125132 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Novel Self-Adhesive Composite Hybrid Versus Conventional Composite in Restoration of Carious Primary Teeth.
NCT05173753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of 2 Different Resin Based Filling Materials in Posterior Teeth - a Multicenter Study
NCT01925040 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05380973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two GIC's in the Restoration of Posterior Class II Lesions in the Primary Dentition
NCT05965297 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Patients Risk Factors on the Longevity of Aesthetic Restorations
NCT03834636 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A 24-month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT03527953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT04306549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Performance and Occlusal Wear of Low Shrinkage Giomer Compared to Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT05949502 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Restorative Materials
NCT06637605 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
A RCT to Compare Post-operative Sensitivity of Restorations With Fill-Up, a Dual Curing Composite and Conventional Composite Resin
NCT03513692 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the 2-year Clinical Performances of Class II Restorations Using Different Restorative Materials
NCT06562868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Composite Materials
NCT06058026 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ceramic Tooth Restorations - a Comparison Study
NCT03517124 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Performance of a Newly Developed Glass Ionomer Restorative for Posterior Restorations in an Adult Population
NCT06275581 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Assessment of Glass Carbomer Cement
NCT03030690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA