A 24-month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT03527953 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2018-05-17
Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of three different bulk-fill restorative resin materials; a bulk fill resin composite, a flowable bulk fill resin composite and a fiber-reinforced resin in Class II restorations over a period of 24 months.
Conditions
- Dental Caries
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Tetric EvoCeram Bulkfill
The preparation will be etched with 37% phosphoric acid. It will be then rinsed with an air-water spray and dried, leaving the dentin slightly moist. An etch-and-rinse adhesive, ExciTE F, will be applied and agitated on the prepared surfaces for at least 10 seconds. The adhesive will be air-thinned and light-cured for 20 seconds with an LED curing unit. The sectional matrix will be placed and fixed with wooden wedges. Then the bulk-fill resin composite, TBF, will be placed in bulk in about 4-mm thickness and then will be cured for 20 seconds.
- OTHER
-
Surefil SDR Flowable bulkfill
The preparation will be etched. A two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, Prime\&Bond NT will be applied to all enamel/dentin surfaces, air-dried for 5 seconds, and will be light cured for 10 seconds. After the sectional matrix will be placed, the flowable bulk-fill resin composite, SureFil SDR™ flow (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, DE, USA), will be placed in a 4-mm bulk increment in the dentinal part cured for 20 seconds and will be followed by a covering layer of the nanohybrid resin composite, Ceram.X Mono that will be cured for 20 seconds.
- OTHER
-
everX fiber-reinforced resin
The enamel will be etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 10 seconds, then will be rinsed, and dried with an air/water syringe for at least 5 seconds. Self-etch adhesive, G-aenial Bond (GC Co., Tokyo, Japan), will be applied to all enamel/dentin surfaces and gently air thinned and then will be light cured for 10 seconds. After the matrix will be placed and wedged, mesial or distal walls will be built with 1-2-mm layers of G-aenial Posterior resin composite. The fiber-reinforced composite, everX Posterior, will be placed into the cavity in approximately 4-mm thickness. The last 2 mm of the cavity will be restored using the G-aenial Posterior composite as an overlay layer. Each increment will be light cured for 20 seconds using an LED unit.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hacettepe University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
A.Ruya Yazici, DDS, PhD · Hacettepe University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 41 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2015-11-30
- Completion
- 2016-01-31
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Flowable Composites on Postoperative Sensitivity in Class I Restorations.
NCT07343050 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Comparison of Bulk-fill Restorative and Nano-fill Resin Composite
NCT04320576 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Restorative Materials
NCT06109987 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT04306549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of a Highly-filled Flowable Composite in Class III Restorations.
NCT07051551 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Composite Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT04565860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Bulk-fill and Incremental Composite
NCT04685954 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Restorative Glass Ionomer and a Bulk-fill Composite Resin
NCT04685967 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material and Two Different Resin Composites
NCT06375837 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the 2-year Clinical Performances of Class II Restorations Using Different Restorative Materials
NCT06562868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Composite Resins in Class I Cavities
NCT06192667 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Nano-Hybrid vs Bulk-Fill Resin Composites
NCT05432258 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Bioactive Material
NCT04825379 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Single Color Universal Composite Resin Restorative Materials.
NCT06125132 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Class II Restorations With High-Filled Flowable Composites
NCT06346795 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Composite in Class I Cavities
NCT03556553 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Different Flowable Resin Composites
NCT04324008 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of HVGIC vs Bulk Fill Composite in Class II Cavities of Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month RCT
NCT07067164 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Marginal Integrity of Recent Bulk Fill Flowable Composite vs Glass Ionomer for Carious Cervical Restorations: RCCT
NCT04053530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Different Methods of Resin Composite Application In Class II Restorations
NCT02185573 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
NCT04293770 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Could Bulk Fill Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials Replace Composite Resins in Treating Permanent Teeth?
NCT05551130 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Composite Materials
NCT06058026 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Comparison of Restorative Materials
NCT06637605 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA