MedTrace Logo

Ceramic Tooth Restorations - a Comparison Study

NCT03517124 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2018-05-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized clinical study aims to compare success and survival of two different ceramic tooth restoration materials. The hypothesis for the study is that fluoride treated zirconia will retain as good as lithium disilicate reinforced glass ceramic when cemented by the same resin cement.

One group of patients will receive a restoration in fluoride treated zirconia, the other group will receive a restoration in reinforced glass ceramic. All restorations will be cemented in the same manner. At 3, 6, 12 and 24 months the participants will be examined.

Conditions

  • Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity

Interventions

OTHER

Ceramic tooth restoration

Dental restorations

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Nordic Institute of Dental Materials

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • University of Oslo

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jan Eirik Ellingsen, Professor · Faculty of Dentistry, Institute of Clinical Dentistry

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-05
Primary Completion
2018-12-31
Completion
2020-12-31

Countries

  • Norway

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03517124 on ClinicalTrials.gov