MedTrace Logo

SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

NCT02800512 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 112

Last updated 2025-01-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of R-SCP versus HUSLS for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Conditions

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse
  • Cystocele
  • Rectocele
  • Enterocele

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Robotic sacrocolpopexy

Sacrocolpopexy is a procedure to surgically correct vaginal vault prolapse where mesh is used to hold the vagina in the correct anatomical position. Robotic assistance is a minimally invasive method to perform this abdominal procedure.

PROCEDURE

high uterosacral ligament suspension

Utilizing uterosacral ligaments to support the vaginal cuff can be performed vaginally-by passing sutures bilaterally through the uterosacral ligaments. near the level of the ischial spine. HUSLS is a vaginal minimally invasive procedure for POP.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Loma Linda University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Sam Siddighi · Loma Linda University Health Care

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
100 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-12-31
Primary Completion
2025-12-31
Completion
2025-12-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02800512 on ClinicalTrials.gov