Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures - Randomized Trial
NCT01802281 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 183
Last updated 2025-08-26
Summary
The primary purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two transvaginal apical suspension strategies for uterovaginal prolapse: a mesh augmented hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS). The primary aim is to determine whether treatment success in women who undergo the above strategies differ at time points through 3 years.
A supplemental study investigates anterior vaginal wall movement resulting from descent or rotation of the vaginal apex and/or anterior vaginal elongation, in women in both of the study arms of SUPeR.
Conditions
- Uterovaginal Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Uterosacral ligament suspension
The USLS procedure used in this protocol is a modification of the technique described by Shull.
- PROCEDURE
-
Uphold® LITE
The Uphold® procedure used in this protocol is a modification of the technique described by Vu and Goldberg.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Boston Scientific Corporation
collaborator INDUSTRY -
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
lead NETWORK
Principal Investigators
-
Charles W Nager, MD · University of California at San Diego, UCSD Women's Pelvic Medicine Center
-
Anthony G Visco, MD · Duke University, Duke Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
-
Heidi Harvie, MD · University of Pennsylvania
-
Marie Paraiso, MD · Cleveland Clinic, Department OB/GYN
-
Charles R Rardin, MD · Brown/ Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Center for Women's Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
-
Holly E Richter, PhD, MD · University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Kate Meriwether, MD · University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Halina M Zyczynski, MD · Magee-Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Sonia Thomas, DrPH · RTI International
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-07-31
- Completion
- 2025-03-07
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Vaginal Uphold Hysteropexy and Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT01377142 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prophylactic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Prevention of Vaginal Vault Prolapse
NCT01364025 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized,Multicentric Study to Treat Prolapse After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure
NCT00572702 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Shull Suspension Comparison Trial
NCT05856201 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Vaginal Vault Suspension to the Uterosacral Ligaments for Stage II-III Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT03553511 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Combination of Laparoskopic Uterosacral Ligament and Round Ligament Plication, A Meshless Method in the Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT04894032 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Laparoscopic Lateral Mesh Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03387202 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension With Mesh & Sacrocervicopexy for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse
NCT03421457 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02741830 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pectopexy Autologous Vs Mesh
NCT06524700 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Long Term Follow up of Anterior Meshes for Recurrent Prolapse
NCT02642835 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy.
NCT04178083 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Randomized Controlled Trail of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418438 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Vault Suspension During Benign Hysterectomy. A Questionnaire and Register-based Study.
NCT02859272 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Prospective Study for Vaginal Vault Prolapse After Hysterectomy: Comparison of Two Surgical Methods
NCT02290288 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension as a Uterine Preserving Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06982157 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Vs Robotic-assisted Colposacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02852512 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectiveness Comparison Between Vaginal Versus Robotic Mesh Surgery for Apical Prolapse: Prospective, Cohort Study
NCT03878056 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension With or Without Hysterectomy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07094815 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Supracervical Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy
NCT04797585 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Post-hysterectomy Vaginal Cuff Prolapse Repair
NCT07174921 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Perineorrhaphy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT07006129 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Techniques in Uterine-preserving Apical Prolapsus Repair
NCT05143658 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic/Robotic-assisted Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT02877407 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pelvic Floor Support After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Vaginal Cuff Closure Techniques
NCT03753516 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA