Apical Suspension Repair for Vault Prolapse In a Three-Arm Randomized Trial Design
NCT02676973 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 360
Last updated 2025-08-26
Summary
The study is a multi-center, randomized, surgical trial of women with symptomatic post-hysterectomy apical (cuff) prolapse desiring surgical treatment. This study will compare the three available surgical treatments performed in usual practice. The purpose of this study is to compare two commonly performed mesh apical repair (sacral colpopexy vs. Apical Transvaginal Mesh) and vaginal native tissue apical repairs with mesh reinforced repairs. The primary outcome is measured over time (up to 60 months) using a survival analysis approach. Participants will be followed for at least 36-months (3-years) post surgery and up to a maximum of 60-months (5-years) during the primary trial. Participants who complete the primary trial will be approached for consent for long-term follow-up as part of a study extension and will be followed up to a maximum of 120-months (10-years).
The investigators hypothesize that treatment failure will not differ between vaginally and abdominally placed mesh for vault vaginal prolapse, and mesh repairs (regardless of route of implantation) will be superior to native tissue apical suspension.
Conditions
- Visceral Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Open, Robotic, or Laparoscopic
Sacral Colpopexy is a surgery performed either through an incision in the abdomen or through several small incisions with the help of a laparoscope (a slender tube) or robot. The surgery is done with a permanent synthetic (man-made) mesh. The mesh is sutured (stitched) to the vagina and sacrum (tail bone) and is used as reinforcement. It provides additional support to weakened tissues and/or muscles.
- PROCEDURE
-
Transvaginal Native Tissue Repair
Transvaginal Native Tissue Repair is a surgery performed with an incision through the vagina (transvaginal). The surgery is done using both permanent and absorbable sutures (stitches), to support weakened tissue and/or muscles, and attach the top of the vagina to ligaments in the pelvis (either to the sacrospinous ligament or uterosacral ligament).
- PROCEDURE
-
Uphold™ LITE
Transvaginal Mesh Repair is a surgery performed with an incision through the vagina (transvaginal). The surgery is done with a permanent synthetic (man-made) mesh. The mesh is attached to ligaments in the pelvis and is used to reinforce natural tissue and/or muscles, which are no longer able to provide support to the vagina.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The Cleveland Clinic
collaborator OTHER -
University of Alabama at Birmingham
collaborator OTHER -
University of California, San Diego
collaborator OTHER - collaborator OTHER
-
University of New Mexico
collaborator OTHER -
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
collaborator OTHER -
RTI International
collaborator OTHER - collaborator OTHER
-
University of Pittsburgh
collaborator OTHER -
Kaiser Permanente
collaborator OTHER -
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
collaborator OTHER -
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
collaborator NIH -
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
lead NETWORK
Principal Investigators
-
Shawn Menefee, MD · Kaiser Permanente San Diego
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-02-29
- Primary Completion
- 2022-07-28
- Completion
- 2026-12-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Vaginal Vault Suspension to the Uterosacral Ligaments for Stage II-III Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT03553511 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Long Term Follow up of Anterior Meshes for Recurrent Prolapse
NCT02642835 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Supracervical Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy
NCT04797585 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT05063331 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Novel Laparoscopic Apical Promontofixation Technique With Simultaneous Perineal Reconstruction for Patients With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07271862 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Combination of Laparoskopic Uterosacral Ligament and Round Ligament Plication, A Meshless Method in the Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT04894032 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Effectiveness of Perineorrhaphy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT07006129 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02741830 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prophylactic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Prevention of Vaginal Vault Prolapse
NCT01364025 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension as a Uterine Preserving Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06982157 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transvaginal Mesh vs. Laparoscopic Colposacropexy- Study
NCT04478747 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic/Robotic-assisted Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT02877407 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Apical Repair Methods in Women Undergoing Repairs for Prolapse
NCT03113513 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Complications Associated With Promontofixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Comparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic and Non-robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures
NCT01320215 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT00581334 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Four-arm Mesh for Vaginal Stump Prolapse
NCT03809806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trail of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418438 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized,Multicentric Study to Treat Prolapse After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure
NCT00572702 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Difference in Pain, Quality of Life Following Vaginal Hysterectomy With Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Colpopexy?
NCT02049996 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Post-hysterectomy Vaginal Cuff Prolapse Repair
NCT07174921 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectiveness Comparison Between Vaginal Versus Robotic Mesh Surgery for Apical Prolapse: Prospective, Cohort Study
NCT03878056 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During Sacrocolpopexy
NCT05969067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Techniques in Uterine-preserving Apical Prolapsus Repair
NCT05143658 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension With Mesh & Sacrocervicopexy for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse
NCT03421457 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA