Follow-up Study After Manchester Operation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT02246387 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 209
Last updated 2023-11-02
Summary
Native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the predominant surgical technique in the investigators department and the Manchester operation the preferred procedure. The investigators long-term reoperation rates for pevic organ prolapse are very low, as documented in the investigators previous long-term follow-up study (Oversand et al, International Urogynecology Journal 2013), however the data were retrospective and patients with avulsions of the levator ani muscle were not identified. The investigators hypothesize that correct fixation and elevation of the vaginal apex, as part of a three-compartment repair procedure, is essential in the POP surgical repair, also when treating women with levator ani avulsions.
The purpose of this study is to:
* prospectively evaluate if cardinal/sacrouterine ligament plication (as part of the 3-compartment Manchester procedure) gives an adequate elevation and fixation of the vaginal apex.
* assess changes in subjective symptoms between the preoperative evaluation and the 1 and 5-year postoperative evaluations.
* evaluate whether the patients identified with levator avulsions in the investigators population have an increased risk of failure (objectively and subjectively).
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Manchester Operation
A 3- compartment native tissue repair procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Oslo University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Sissel H Oversand, MD · Oslo University Hospital
-
Anne C Staff, PhD · Oslo University Hospital; University of Oslo
-
Rune Svenningsen, PhD · Oslo University Hospital; University of Oslo
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2018-01-31
- Completion
- 2023-01-31
Countries
- Norway
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Techniques in Uterine-preserving Apical Prolapsus Repair
NCT05143658 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Different Procedures of Colpocleisis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06482697 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension With or Without Hysterectomy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07094815 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT05063331 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Novel Laparoscopic Apical Promontofixation Technique With Simultaneous Perineal Reconstruction for Patients With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07271862 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Complications Associated With Promontofixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Comparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic and Non-robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures
NCT01320215 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT01182090 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Sacrocolpopexy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Lateral Suspension in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03722563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacrocolpopexy, the Amreich-Richter Procedure and Transvaginal Mesh
NCT03053479 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Vault Suspension During Benign Hysterectomy. A Questionnaire and Register-based Study.
NCT02859272 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy.
NCT04178083 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Pectopexy With and Without Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT07306715 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Versus POPS in the Management of Pelvic Prolapse
NCT02911584 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized,Multicentric Study to Treat Prolapse After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure
NCT00572702 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension With Mesh & Sacrocervicopexy for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse
NCT03421457 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Results of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy Surgeries Performed Without Mesh in the Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06176521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Uphold Hysteropexy and Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT01377142 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Lateral Suspension
NCT05586984 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Comparison Between Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension as a Uterine Preserving Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06982157 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
AMBULAPSE STUDY Feasibility Study on Laparoscopic Double-mesh Sacrocolpopexy With or Without Robotic Assistance, in Female Patients Presenting With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Based on an Outpatient Treatment Model.
NCT03764852 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of Long-term Pessary Use on Pelvic Organ Prolapse oìduring Covid-19 Pandemic in Patients Attending Surgery
NCT06234449 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Compare Sacrospinous Fixation Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Fixation for Uterus Vaginal Prolapse III/IV
NCT01347021 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Colporrhaphies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT06902909 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
A Long Term Follow up of Anterior Meshes for Recurrent Prolapse
NCT02642835 ·Status: COMPLETED