Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT00581334 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2023-08-23
Summary
Robotic-assisted Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy is both a feasible and safe method for apical prolapse repair of the vagina.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
4 abdominal incisions will be made: 1 infraumbilical port and 3 lateral ports. The peritoneum overlaying the sacrum is entered and the anterior longitudinal ligament is exposed. 3 permanent sutures are placed through the ligament at the S2-S3. Then a vaginal obturator is placed transvaginally and the apex of vagina is elevated into the operative field. The peritoneum overlying the anterior and posterior vaginal epithelium is reflected and the bladder is dissected off the underlying vagina to expose 4cm of apical vagina. 2 segments of polypropylene mesh are prepared and one segment is anchored along the anterior vagina with a series of interrupted permanent suture and the second segment is anchored along the posterior vagina. These 2 segments are brought together to the previously placed sutures within the anterior longitudinal ligament of the sacrum. The peritoneum is then closed over the graft complex and the pelvis irrigated. The 4 robotic ports are removed and the abdomen closed.
- PROCEDURE
-
Open sacrocolpopexy
mesh augmented repair for post-hysterectomy prolapse performed via open laparotomy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of California, Irvine
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Felicia Lane, M.D. · University of California, Irvine
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2007-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2012-06-30
- Completion
- 2012-06-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical Strategies
NCT01124916 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02741830 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Sacropexy With Robot-Assisted Surgical System
NCT00886223 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During Sacrocolpopexy
NCT05969067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Uphold Hysteropexy and Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT01377142 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Complications Associated With Promontofixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Comparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic and Non-robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures
NCT01320215 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Retrovesical Colpopectinopexia
NCT02919852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Indwelling vs Immediate Removal of Foley Catheter After Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: a Prospective Study
NCT02765893 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Apical Suspension Repair for Vault Prolapse In a Three-Arm Randomized Trial Design
NCT02676973 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Technique in Sacrospinous Fixation for Treatment of Apical Genital Prolapse
NCT05691543 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
A Randomized Controlled Trail of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418438 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Validation Study for Robotic Surgery Simulator
NCT01618994 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT05063331 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy/Safety of Urogynecology Synthetic Mesh Surgery
NCT05682989 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Novel Laparoscopic Apical Promontofixation Technique With Simultaneous Perineal Reconstruction for Patients With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07271862 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Vs Robotic-assisted Colposacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02852512 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Pectopexy With and Without Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT07306715 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Urogynecological Surgery: Hospital Stay and Perioperative Complications
NCT01033786 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacrocolpopexy, the Amreich-Richter Procedure and Transvaginal Mesh
NCT03053479 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ROBYN Study - Robotic Assisted Surgery in Gynecological Indications Compared to Conventional Laparoscopy
NCT05496244 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Laparoscopic/Robotic-assisted Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT02877407 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectiveness Comparison Between Vaginal Versus Robotic Mesh Surgery for Apical Prolapse: Prospective, Cohort Study
NCT03878056 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Comparison Between Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension as a Uterine Preserving Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06982157 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Long Term Follow-up
NCT01394237 ·Status: COMPLETED