Intraoperative Costs and Patient Perceptions in Sacrocolpopexy for Prolapse
NCT04179955 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2026-03-31
Summary
Robotic sacrocolpopexy (a procedure for female pelvic organ prolapse) has been demonstrated to have equivalent surgical outcomes to open abdominal sacrocolpopexy and has been previously deemed more cost effective due to the longer hospital course following open procedures. The total cost of these procedures, including all costs of hospitalization as well as costs associated with the 30 days following surgery have previously been evaluated by the investigators. However, previous research is lacking in both the specific cost components that contribute to intraoperative cost of surgery as well as the patient perceived outcomes following these two procedures. This project aims to evaluate the marginal costs of surgery and to survey sacrocolpopexy patients to evaluate their satisfaction with outcomes and surgical scars.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Sponsors & Collaborators
- lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Emanuel C Trabuco, M.D. · Mayo Clinic
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-12-10
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-31
- Completion
- 2026-12-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
AMBULAPSE STUDY Feasibility Study on Laparoscopic Double-mesh Sacrocolpopexy With or Without Robotic Assistance, in Female Patients Presenting With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Based on an Outpatient Treatment Model.
NCT03764852 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectiveness Comparison Between Vaginal Versus Robotic Mesh Surgery for Apical Prolapse: Prospective, Cohort Study
NCT03878056 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic Assisted Sacral Colpopexy : A Prospective Study Assessing Outcomes With Learning Curves
NCT01535833 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Results of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy Surgeries Performed Without Mesh in the Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06176521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy/Safety of Urogynecology Synthetic Mesh Surgery
NCT05682989 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Indwelling vs Immediate Removal of Foley Catheter After Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: a Prospective Study
NCT02765893 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During Sacrocolpopexy
NCT05969067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Urogynecological Surgery: Hospital Stay and Perioperative Complications
NCT01033786 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Lateral Suspension Versus Sacral Colpopexy POP
NCT03644628 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacrocolpopexy, the Amreich-Richter Procedure and Transvaginal Mesh
NCT03053479 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical Strategies
NCT01124916 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Supracervical Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy
NCT04797585 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Colporrhaphies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT06902909 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Effectiveness of Perineorrhaphy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT07006129 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Efficacy of Different Procedures of Colpocleisis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06482697 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trail of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418438 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Pectopexy With and Without Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT07306715 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Sacrocolpopexy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Lateral Suspension in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03722563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Difference in Pain, Quality of Life Following Vaginal Hysterectomy With Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Colpopexy?
NCT02049996 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03379246 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Complications Associated With Promontofixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Comparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic and Non-robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures
NCT01320215 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare Sacrospinous Fixation Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Fixation for Uterus Vaginal Prolapse III/IV
NCT01347021 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Comparison Between Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension as a Uterine Preserving Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06982157 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-NSQIP Analysis.
NCT03421067 ·Status: COMPLETED