Intraperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Uterosacral Ligament Suspensions for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse
NCT04172896 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2019-11-21
Summary
Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse is a common pelvic floor disorder described as descent of the vaginal apex after hysterectomy. The incidence of post-hysterectomy vault prolapse has been reported to follow 11.6% of hysterectomies performed for prolapse and 1.8% for other benign diseases. The majority of surgical repairs to correct post-hysterectomy vault prolapse are approached via a transvaginal route. A common transvaginal procedure to correct vaginal vault prolapse is the uterosacral ligament suspension. Traditionally, the uterosacral ligaments have been accessed intraperitoneally to perform the vaginal suspension. More recently, an extraperitoneal approach has been utilized with good results. There is limited evidence comparing the the two approaches. Thus, the objectives of this study are to compare compare operative time, hospital stay, cost, surgical success, and other perioperative outcomes between the two approaches.
Conditions
- Vaginal Vault Prolapse
- Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse
- Prolapse, Vaginal
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Intraperitoneal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension
Vaginal intraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension performed by transfixing the ligament, intraperitoneally, in the intermediate portion (at the level of or above ischial spine plane) with three delayed absorbable 0 sutures, performed bilaterally (three sutures per side; six sutures total).
- PROCEDURE
-
Extraperitoneal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension
Vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension performed by transfixing the ligament, extraperitoneally, in the intermediate portion (at the level of or above ischial spine plane) using a suture capturing device with two delayed absorbable 0 sutures, performed bilaterally (two sutures per side; four sutures total).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Tristi Muir, MD · The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
-
Danny Mounir, MD · The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-11-01
- Primary Completion
- 2020-09-30
- Completion
- 2021-09-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse
NCT01594372 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Post-hysterectomy Vaginal Cuff Prolapse Repair
NCT07174921 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT05063331 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Total Versus Subtotal Abdominal Hysterectomy at Time of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy
NCT04178473 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Vaginal Vault Suspension to the Uterosacral Ligaments for Stage II-III Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT03553511 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Long Term Follow up of Anterior Meshes for Recurrent Prolapse
NCT02642835 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Randomized Controlled Trail of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418438 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT03832543 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pelvic Floor Support After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Vaginal Cuff Closure Techniques
NCT03753516 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Supracervical Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy
NCT04797585 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Vertical Versus Horizontal Vaginal Cuff Closure on Vaginal Length After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02276261 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension as a Uterine Preserving Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06982157 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Lateral Suspension Operations
NCT04072588 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Perineorrhaphy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT07006129 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Outcomes on Abdominal Versus Vaginal Morcellation At Time of Hysterectomy
NCT04434066 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications
NCT05960292 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tissue Removal During Hysterectomy: The Effect of Vaginal Versus Abdominal Morcellation on Surgical Outcomes
NCT02703246 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of PHVP of Different VTH Methods
NCT03858673 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Randomized,Multicentric Study to Treat Prolapse After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure
NCT00572702 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Uphold Hysteropexy and Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT01377142 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
0050-19-RMB CTIL - VNOTES Compared to VH for Vaginal Apex Prolapse
NCT04078802 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic/Robotic-assisted Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT02877407 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pectopexy Autologous Vs Mesh
NCT06524700 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginally Assisted Laparoscopic Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT03436147 ·Status: COMPLETED