The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones
NCT03206515 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 86
Last updated 2017-07-02
Summary
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) has been considered as the first-line choice for the management of \>20mm kidney stones. Microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) which takes nephrolithotomy channel size less than or equal to 18, was first used in the treatment of children with kidney stones in 1997, then gradually applied to adult, aims to achieve the similar stone clearance rate as the standard channels, at the same time, reduce the complications. At present, the use of percutaneous renal surgery in our country is more than 18F plastic peel-away sheath, with the access sheath with a suction-evacuation function was first used by Guohua Zeng and so on. But there is still a lack of high quality evidence of Evidence-based medical evidence to compare the two kinds of sheath for the safety and effectiveness. Therefore, this study provides a reliable theoretical basis for the choice of the sheath for the treatment of 2-5cm size Kidney, and ultimately benefit patients with 20mm.
Conditions
- Renal Calculi
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
18F Peel-Way Sheath
Patients undergoing Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with The 18F peel-way sheath
- DEVICE
-
18F access sheath with a suction-evacuation function
Patients undergoing Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with The 18F access sheath with a suction-evacuation function
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Guohua Zeng, PH.D and M.D · The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-12-31
- Completion
- 2017-12-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Retrograde Ureteral Catheterization Is Not Essential in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06750913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tubeless vs Tube PCNL in Pediatric Nephrolithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT07183930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT07159035 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Disposable 7.5Fr Electronic Flexible Ureteroscope Combined 10Fr Ureteral Access Sheath for Treatment of Renal Stone <2cm
NCT06491524 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of SMP on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo
NCT02760134 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheaths Versus Conventional Sheaths for Treatment of Nephrolithiasis
NCT05993546 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02519634 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Failed Insertion of Ureteral Access Sheath During Flexible Ureterorenoscopy
NCT05911945 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of Radiation-Free Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones
NCT06922006 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Ureteroscopy Combined With Negative Pressure Sheath Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT06938113 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Disposable Versus Disposable Nephroscope During PCNLs: a Feasibility RCT
NCT06579924 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Total Tubeless Mini-PCNL Versus Tubeless Mini-PCNL
NCT06288022 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fluoroscopic Guided vs US-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy for the Treatment of Stone Disease
NCT04606758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Standard-PCNL vs Mini-PCNL vs Super-mini PCNL for the Treatment of ≥2 cm Renal Stone
NCT03771365 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Standard vs Mini-PCNL for the Treatment of Stone Disease
NCT04069013 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Abdominal Cushion on PCNL in Prone Position
NCT03797027 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Intelligent Pressure-controlled Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT05201599 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Efficiency and Stone-Free Rates Mini PCNL vs Flex URS
NCT07072598 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of a Ureteral Access Sheath During Ureteroscopy and Its Effect on Stone Free Rate
NCT00199524 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Under Direct Vision vs Under Non Direct Vision of Insertion of UAS in RIRS
NCT03717285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA