MedTrace Logo

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Two Different Appliances in the Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

NCT00957489 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 64

Last updated 2023-05-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Twin-Block treatment and Dynamax treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion do not have different effects with regards to treatment duration, the quality of dento-occlusal outcome, skeletal and soft tissue profile, patient discomfort and gingival health.

Conditions

  • Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Interventions

OTHER

Dynamax appliance

OTHER

Twin-block appliance

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Health Service, United Kingdom

    collaborator OTHER_GOV

  • University of Manchester

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kevin O'Brien, BDS, MSc, FDSRCS, DORth, PhD · Prof of Orthodontics/ Associate Dean Teaching and Learning, University of Manchester

  • Jonathan Sandler, BDS, MSc, FDSRCS, MOrth RCS · Consultant Orthodontist, Chesterfield NHS Trust

  • Alison Murray, BDS, MSc, FDSRCS, MORth RCS · Consultant Orthodontist, Derby NHS Trust

  • Badri ' Thiruvenkatachari, BDS, MDS, MOrth RCS, PhD · Clinical Teaching Fellow in Orthodontics, University of Manchester

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
10 Years
Max Age
14 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2007-01-31
Primary Completion
2008-09-30
Completion
2008-09-30

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00957489 on ClinicalTrials.gov