Tracheal Intubation vs. Bag-valve-mask Ventilation in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest _ CAAM STUDY

NCT02327026 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 2043

Last updated 2017-05-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to improve the management of patients in cardiac arrest, and this by comparing two initial airway management methods: Tracheal intubation and bag-valve-mask ventilation.

The survival rate at 28-day with favorable neurological function will be compared in the tracheal intubation group versus the bag-valve-mask group

Conditions

  • Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Interventions

PROCEDURE

bag-valve-mask ventilation

Airway management including initial bag-valve-mask ventilation by the medical team during OHCA. When standard bag-valve-mask ventilation is possible, the patient will be intubated in case of a return of spontaneous circulation. When standard bag-valve-mask ventilation is impossible or in case of massive regurgitation of gastric content (after randomisation), intubation of patient is the preferred alternative.

PROCEDURE

tracheal intubation

Tracheal intubation during OHCA by the medical team: The standard intubation procedure is to use a non-styletted tube and no sedation. When standard laryngoscopy-assisted intubation is not possible, an alternate procedure will be used based on the French consensus conference guidelines on difficult airway management

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Frédéric ADNET, MD, PhD · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-03-09
Primary Completion
2017-03-30
Completion
2017-03-30

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02327026 on ClinicalTrials.gov