A RCT on Supraglottic Airway Versus Endotracheal Intubation in OHCA

NCT02967952 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 852

Last updated 2016-11-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this 3-year successive research plan, investigators will conduct a prehospital randomized controlled trial to address the following question: In adult patients with non-traumatic cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitated by emergency medical technician (paramedic level) in the prehospital setting, will receiving endotracheal tube intubation cause a better chance of sustained recovery of spontaneous circulation and other survival outcomes like neurologically favorable status, comparing to those who receiving supraglottic airway device.

Conditions

  • Prehospital Airway Management in Patients With Cardiac Arrest

Interventions

DEVICE

supraglottic airway (SGA) V.S. endotracheal intubation (ETI)

already being described above

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Wen-Chu Chiang, MD, PhD. · Emergency Dept, National Taiwan University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-11-30
Primary Completion
2019-09-30
Completion
2019-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02967952 on ClinicalTrials.gov