Prehospital Laryngeal Tube vs. Bag-Valve Mask Ventilation Used by Paramedics During CPR

NCT01718795 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 78

Last updated 2016-03-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

During CPR bag-valve mask ventilation is difficult for basically skilled rescuers. Ventilation may be inefficient or with too high pressures result in stomach inflation and aspiration. Studies suggest that with a supraglottic airway device, such as the laryngeal tube, a basically skilled rescuer may ventilate more efficient and also safer. No prehospital study has been conducted comparing laryngeal tube and bag-valve mask ventilation during CPR. Thus, this study intends to compare ventilation with laryngeal tube and bag-valve mask performed by paramedics during CPR.

Conditions

  • Cardiac Arrest During and/or Resulting From A Procedure

Interventions

DEVICE

Bag-valve mask or laryngeal tube ventilation

Interventions are either "Bag-valve mask (BVM)" or "Laryngeal tube (LT)" ventilation during CPR

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Michael Baubin, MD

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Michael Baubin, Prof. MD · Medical University Innsbruck

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-09-30
Primary Completion
2015-09-30
Completion
2015-09-30

Countries

  • Austria

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01718795 on ClinicalTrials.gov