MedTrace Logo

Splint Versus Non-splint Implant Impressions

NCT01104363 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2018-08-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of heavy Vinyl PolySiloxane (VPS) and splinted implants impression (Study Group, SG) technique versus plaster implant impression (Control Group, CG) technique, in 12 edentulous patients rehabilitated with the All-on-4/6 concept and Procera® Implant Bridge (P.I.B.). A longitudinal, double blinded, randomised clinical trial (RCT) was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the impression. All patients were monitored from implant placement until prosthetic loading.

Conditions

  • Dental Implants
  • Dental Impression Materials
  • Dental Impression Techniques

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Snow white plaster 2

Test. Plaster impression not splinted.

PROCEDURE

Primopattern LC gel + PVS

Control PVS impression

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Nobel Biocare

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • Hospital San Pietro Fatebenefratelli

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Marco Tallarico, dr. · Private Practice

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-06-30
Primary Completion
2010-09-30
Completion
2011-05-31

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01104363 on ClinicalTrials.gov