MedTrace Logo

PROMs Comparing Digital & Conventional Workflows

NCT04986761 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2021-08-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) analyzed monolithic single-unit implant restorations out of lithium disilicate (LS2) or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (PICN) in a chairside digital workflow (Test) and a conventional protocol (Control). The primary outcome was subjective patient perception in terms of PROMs comparing digital and conventional impression techniques as well as patients' satisfaction related to the final implant restoration among difference workflows and materials. The secondary outcome was to investigate the objective evaluation by a dental professional applying the functional implant prosthodontic score (FIPS). The null-hypothesis of this RCT was that both workflows and the two materials for the monolithic implant restorations had comparable results with respect to the defined outcomes.

Conditions

  • Dental Implant

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Treatment of implant single crown

Digital or Conventional Workflows for treatment of implant single crown and materials used.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • ITI International Team for Implantology, Switzerland

    collaborator OTHER

  • Mahidol University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
25 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-07-01
Primary Completion
2021-03-31
Completion
2021-03-31

Countries

  • Thailand

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04986761 on ClinicalTrials.gov