MedTrace Logo

Sleeves Versus Sleeveless Template

NCT03641365 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2018-08-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare virtual planning accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using CAD/CAM stereolithographic surgical templates with or without metallic sleeves.Furthermore to compare open versus closed holes in case of sleeveless templates.

Any partially edentulous patients requiring at least one implant to be planed according to a computer-assisted template-based protocol were enrolled. Patients were randomised according to a parallel group design into two arms: surgical template with or without metallic sleeves. Three deviation parameters (angular, horizontal, vertical) were defined to evaluate the discrepancy between the planned and placed implant positions.

Conditions

  • Guided Surgery Accuracy
  • Dental Implant Failed
  • Complications

Interventions

DEVICE

Test group

Guided Implant placement Positioning/placement of dental implants thought the fully acrylic surgical template without metallic sleeves.

DEVICE

Control group

Guided Implant placement Positioning/placement of dental implants thought the acrylic surgical template with metallic sleeves.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Osstem AIC

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Marco Tallarico, Dr · Studio Marco Tallarico

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-09-01
Primary Completion
2018-05-30
Completion
2018-05-30

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03641365 on ClinicalTrials.gov