Zygomatic Versus Conventional Dental Implants in Augmented Maxillae
NCT01961284 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL
Last updated 2017-09-25
Summary
Dental implants are used for replacing missing teeth. Placing dental implants is limited by the presence of adequate bone volume permitting their anchorage. In order to solve this problem several bone augmentation procedures have been developed. In principle the missing bone is taken from a donor site (for example the hip), transplanted where needed and then implants are placed. Sometimes, major bone grafting operations have to be undertaken under general anaesthesia requiring patients to be hospitalised for a few days. Some degree of morbidity related to the donor site must be expected, though more recently bone substitutes are used to minimize morbidity, and 2 to 3 surgical interventions may be needed before the implants can be functionally used. Sometimes patients have to wait more than 1 year before a prosthesis can be fixed to the implants and the total cost of the treatment is high. At the beginning of the 1990s a long screwshaped implant was developed by Professor PI Brånemark as an alternative to bone augmentation procedures: the zygomatic implant. Zygomatic implants are generally inserted through the palate to engage the body of the cheek bone. One to three zygomatic implants can be inserted through the posterior palate to engage the body of each cheek bone. The potential main advantages of zygomatic implants could be that bone grafting may not be needed and a fixed prosthesis could be fitted the same day of their placement. Despite that zygomatic implants have been used for more than 20 years, their effectiveness has never been compared with conventional dental implants in augmented maxillae. The aim of the project is to compare the longtermclinical outcome of fullarch upper jaw bridges supported by zygomatic implants versus conventional implants placed in augmented bone in the palate.
Conditions
- Edentulous Maxilla
- Resorbed Maxilla
- Implant Therapy
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Zygomatic implant placement
- DEVICE
-
conventional implants and augmentation of maxilla
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
collaborator OTHER -
NHS Lothian
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Victor Lopes, PhD · NHS Lothian
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-08-31
- Completion
- 2017-08-31
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation and Static Template in Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT06051266 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Implant Overdentures
NCT04569929 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of CAD/CAM Milled and 3D-printed Full-arch Implant-supported Provisionals Restorations
NCT05958043 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Role of Immediate Provisional Restorations on Bone Level Implants
NCT00906165 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Marginal Bone Remodeling at Monolithic Zirconia Full-Arch Prostheses in the Maxilla and Mandible
NCT07323290 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study of Neodent Implantable Devices of GM Zygomatic Line
NCT04328116 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss and Associated Factors Around Ziacom Dental Implants With Different Prosthetic Connection
NCT05859113 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Study Evaluating the Performance of Nanotite Osseotite Implants When Placed by Graduate Student Programs
NCT00726063 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Certain Prevail Implants Used to Treat All Types of Edentulism in the Maxilla and Mandible
NCT00728884 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of Removable Versus Fixed Implant-supported Prostheses in Oral Health Quality of Life for Edentulous Patients
NCT05162963 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Full-arch Implant Impression in Maxillary Screw- Retained Implant Prosthesis
NCT05709236 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Longitudinal Efficacy of Dental Implants in Anterior Areas
NCT00641277 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Evaluation of Implant-secured Removable Partial Denture
NCT02762201 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Shape and Surface Treatment of the Transmucosal Abutments on Peri-implant Health.
NCT05284461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Treatment of Implant-retained Mandibular Overdentures for Edentulous Patients
NCT02846805 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Platform Switching vs Regular Platform Implants. One Year Results From a RCT
NCT02123420 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess Crestal Bone Remodeling of Four Different Implant Designs
NCT06821308 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A 36-month Analysis of the Clinical Performance of Individualized CAD/CAM-produced Dental Implants: a Cohort Study
NCT06576284 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
An Evaluation of Integration Success and Maintenance of Short Implants in Maxillas Needing Sinus Augmentation
NCT00725049 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Study For Minimally Invasive Splinted Implants
NCT02107612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of MicroTextured Dental Implants
NCT01821417 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Synthetic Bone Substitute and a Bovine-derived Xenograft in Horizontal Bone Augmentation
NCT00901017 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Digital 3D Printed Temporary Removable Partial Denture.
NCT06106243 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bone Volume Changes in Immediate Implant Placement Using Allograft Versus Xenograft in Mandibular Molars
NCT06962878 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Short Dental Implants (5 mm) Versus Long Dental Implants (10 mm)
NCT04144322 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA