Skin Staples vs Polypropylene in Elective Laparotomy
NCT07781878 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 130
Last updated 2026-08-24
Summary
Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common postoperative complications following elective laparotomy and contributes significantly to patient morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and increased healthcare costs. Various techniques are available for skin closure, including skin staples and polypropylene sutures; however, evidence regarding their comparative effectiveness remains inconsistent, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare skin staples with polypropylene sutures for skin closure following elective laparotomy. Eligible adult patients undergoing elective laparotomy at the Department of General Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either skin staples or polypropylene sutures.
The primary outcomes are skin closure time and incidence of surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes include wound dehiscence, postoperative pain, cosmetic scar appearance, patient satisfaction, and duration of hospital stay.
The findings will provide evidence regarding the optimal skin closure technique for elective laparotomy in the Pakistani population.
Conditions
- Surgical Site Infection
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Skin staples
Disposable stainless steel skin staples will be used for skin closure following elective laparotomy. Skin closure will be performed according to the standard surgical technique of the Department of General Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), immediately after completion of fascial closure.
- DEVICE
-
Polypropylene skin suture
Skin closure will be performed using interrupted polypropylene (Prolene) sutures following elective laparotomy according to the standard surgical technique of the Department of General Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 15 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-31
- Completion
- 2026-12-31
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparing Delayed vs Primary Wound Closure After Emergency Laparotomy: Impact on Infection, Healing, and Hospital Stay
NCT07142395 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Outcome of Purse-string Versus Conventional Linear Wound Closure Techniques in Patients Undergoing Stoma Reversal
NCT07605403 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Continuous Versus Interrupted Suturing on Wound Dehiscence and Infection After Abdominal Surgery
NCT07241507 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fascial Closure Technique After Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery and Postoperative Pain
NCT04765306 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Metallic Clip Ligation and Suture Ligation of Appendicular Stump in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT07129746 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05668130 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hand-made Extracorporeal Knotting Versus Clip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT07281612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Outcome of Primary vs Delayed Primary Closure of Laparotomy in Dirty Abdominal Wounds
NCT07531576 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PDS*Plus and Wound Infections After Laparotomy
NCT00998907 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PDS vs Polyamide for Midline Abdominal Closure
NCT00514566 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Interrupted 'Figure-of-X' Versus Continuous Suturing Technique for Abdominal Wall Closure in Colorectal Laparotomies
NCT07585344 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Titanium vs Absorbable Tacks for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT02076984 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Types of Meshes Used in Pelvic Organs Prolapse Procedures
NCT01645020 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy
NCT03736811 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Permanent Versus Absorbable Colpopexy Trial
NCT02277925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Different Types of Suture for Sacral Colpopexy
NCT03582410 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vicryl Versus Prolene for Midline Rectus Sheath Closure After Elective Laparotomy
NCT07451990 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Skin Adhesive Plus Intra-cuticular Suture Versus Suture Alone for Cesarean Skin Closure
NCT07483411 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement for Stoma Closure
NCT06157645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PROPEL-2: Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Laparotomy Wounds
NCT05977816 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Tissue Sealers on Minor Laparoscopic Procedures Between Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents
NCT05710601 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
STAPLES VERSUS SUTURES FOR MESH FIXATION IN LICHTENSTEIN HERNIOPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL EVALUATING POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES IN INGUINAL HERNIA PATIENTS
NCT07627425 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Polymer Clips Vs Endoloop for Appendicular Stump Ligation
NCT03591419 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Interrupted Suturing Versus Continuous Suturing in Laparotomy Wound Closed.
NCT07601919 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Surgical Repair of Inguinal Hernia Using Sutured Repair Versus Tacker Use
NCT05574751 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA