Comparison of Vicryl Versus Prolene for Midline Rectus Sheath Closure After Elective Laparotomy
NCT07451990 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 152
Last updated 2026-03-05
Summary
This randomized controlled trial compared two commonly used suture materials, Prolene and Vicryl, for closing the midline rectus sheath after elective laparotomy. Proper closure of the abdominal wall is important to reduce complications such as wound dehiscence and surgical site infection. Adult patients undergoing elective midline laparotomy were randomly assigned to rectus sheath closure using either Prolene or Vicryl sutures. All patients received the same standardized surgical technique and postoperative care. Participants were followed for 30 days after surgery to assess wound healing, wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and length of hospital stay. The study aimed to determine which suture material is associated with fewer postoperative wound complications.
Conditions
- Laparotomy Closure After Abdominal Surgery
- Suture Materials
- Complications Wounds
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Vicryl (Polyglactin 910) Suture
Vicryl (polyglactin 910) is an absorbable braided synthetic suture used for closure of the rectus sheath during elective midline laparotomy. The suture is applied using a standard mass closure technique according to institutional surgical protocols.
- DEVICE
-
Prolene (Polypropylene) Suture
Prolene (polypropylene) is a non-absorbable monofilament synthetic suture used for closure of the rectus sheath during elective midline laparotomy. The suture is applied using a standard mass closure technique according to institutional surgical protocols.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hayatabad Medical Complex
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Gohar Ali, MBBS, FCPS · Hayatabad Medical Complex
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-10-30
- Completion
- 2025-11-30
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Vicryl Rapide Versus Nonabsorbable Suture
NCT04056013 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate Together With a Self-adhering Mesh
NCT01658163 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
5-0 Prolene Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut
NCT03303014 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Closing Uterine Incision During C-section Using Barbed Suture (Stratafix) or Vicryl Suture.
NCT03159871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
NCT00466648 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Clinical Study Based on Comparison Between Closure of Uterine Incision With Vicryl 2/0 Versus Vicryl 1 in Development of Uterine Niche.
NCT05770115 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three Sutures With Different Absorption Rates for Lower Abdominal Incision
NCT05787171 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wound Closure After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison of Polypropylene and Polyglactin 910 Suture.
NCT06373900 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Small-bite Versus Conventional Midline Fascial Closure in Abdominal Surgeries
NCT07340918 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Suture Versus Glue (Dermabond) Closure During Cesarean Delivery
NCT02831946 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effectiveness of Wound Closure Using V-Loc™ 90 Sutures in Lipoabdominoplasty Patients
NCT01574378 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ostomy Primary Closure With 0.1% Betaine/Polyhexanide Wound Irrigation Compared to Pursestring Closure
NCT06309368 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison Between Maternal Complications of Chromic Catgut and Vicryl Rapid Sutures Used for Episiotomy Repair
NCT07073131 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Wound Infection Rates and Cosmetic Results of Different Suture Materials in Cesarean Skin Incision
NCT06119113 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Loop Ileostomy Closure:Stapled or Hand-sewn Anastomoses? Suture or Mesh Closure of the Stoma Site?
NCT02669992 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Barbed Suture vs Non-Barbed Closure for Emergency Exploratory Laparotomy RCT
NCT06043414 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Compare Suture Material in Closure of Uterine Incision in Cesarian Section
NCT02517710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT05966961 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Barbed Sutures Versus Conventional Sutures in Laparoscopic Excision of Endometrioma
NCT02308995 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Lacerations Repaired Using Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures
NCT00933829 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Analysis of Subcuticular Suture Materials in Cesarean Section
NCT06543329 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Suture Size in Laparotomy Wound Closure to Prevent Post-operative Complications
NCT05474677 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Staples Versus Prolene Suture for Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery
NCT01509950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of Microbial Adherence to Various Sutures in Patients Undergoing Oral Surgery
NCT02653924 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Use of PrineoTM (Dermabond Protape) Skin Adhesive for Wound Closure Following Abdominoplasty
NCT01544556 ·Status: COMPLETED