Interrupted 'Figure-of-X' Versus Continuous Suturing Technique for Abdominal Wall Closure in Colorectal Laparotomies
NCT07585344 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2026-05-18
Summary
This prospective randomized comparative study aims to evaluate whether interrupted figure-of-X fascial closure reduces the incidence of burst abdomen compared with continuous suturing in patients undergoing open colorectal laparotomy. Burst abdomen is a serious postoperative complication associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and reoperation.
A total of 40 adult patients undergoing elective or emergency colorectal laparotomy will be randomized into two groups: interrupted figure-of-X closure or continuous fascial closure. The primary outcome will be the incidence of burst abdomen within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include surgical site infection, seroma, hematoma, and length of hospital stay.
The study is being conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Akbar Niazi Teaching Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Interrupted 'Figure-of-X' Suturing Technique
For the Figure-of-X: Specify the use of a "slowly absorbable monofilament suture" with "1 cm tissue bites and 1 cm spacing" in an interrupted X-pattern. For the Continuous closure: Specify the use of a "single-layer continuous mass closure" with the same suture material and spacing requirements
- PROCEDURE
-
CONTINUOUS AMSS CLOSURE
The abdominal fascia is closed using a standard single- layer continuous (running) mass closure technique. A slowly absorbable monofilament suture is used to provide prolonged tensile strength. The technique follows a continuous suture line with approximately 1 cm tissue bites from the fascial edges and a 1 cm interval between each loop (travel). The suture is started at one end of the incision and continued to the other, ensuring even tension throughout the length of the midline laparotomy wound.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Islamabad Medical and Dental College
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-11-07
- Primary Completion
- 2026-04-05
- Completion
- 2026-05-15
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Optimal Method of Fascial Closure in High Risk Patients Undergoing Laparotomy
NCT02145052 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Polyglactin vs Polypropylene Sutures for Rectus Sheath Closure
NCT07280975 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Polypropylene Mesh and "Small Bites" Technique in Emergency Colorectal Surgery's Midline Laparotomy Closure. Study for Incisional Hernia Prevention.
NCT06220058 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Suture Techniques to Reduce the Incidence of Incisional Hernia: LTFU STITCH Trial
NCT06066385 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Small Bites Vs Large Bites Abdominal Midline Incisional Closure
NCT07154277 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Short Stitch Versus Traditional Suture for the Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Open Hepatectomy
NCT04982653 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A New Abdomen Closure Technology Based on Component Separation: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03111134 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Conventional and Modified Smead Jones Method for Mass Closure in Emergency Midline Laparotomy
NCT05199974 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Metallic Clip Ligation and Suture Ligation of Appendicular Stump in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT07129746 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fascial Closure Techniques Post-Operative Pain Laparoscopy
NCT03254056 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Risk Factors for Development of Incisional Hernia in Transverse Incisions
NCT03561727 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Delayed vs Primary Wound Closure After Emergency Laparotomy: Impact on Infection, Healing, and Hospital Stay
NCT07142395 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome of Primary vs Delayed Primary Closure of Laparotomy in Dirty Abdominal Wounds
NCT07531576 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of Interrupted Modified Smead-Jones Versus Conventional Continuous Suturing Technique for Closure of Rectus Sheath in Patients Undergoing Laparotomy for Hollow Viscus Perforation.
NCT06697067 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Multicentre Study Evaluating the Outcomes of the Abdominal Wall Dehiscence Repair Using Posterior Component Separation With Transversus Abdominis Muscle Release Reinforced by a Retro-muscular Mesh - Filling a Step
NCT05278117 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh in Incisional Hernia
NCT06197854 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Comparison Of Outcome Of Antibiotic Coated Vicryl Vs Non-Coated Vicryl In Abdominal Fascial Closure After Laparotomy In Children
NCT06129773 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Harmonic Scalpel vs. Suture Ligation for Appendix Base During Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT07049965 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Wound Complications After Elective Abdominal Surgery Using Two Closure Techniques
NCT03527433 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Innovative Suture Technique for Endoscopic Hernia Incision
NCT05781932 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hand-made Extracorporeal Knotting Versus Clip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT07281612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Effect of Barbed Suture Fascia Closure on Incisional Hernia in Midline Laparotomy for Gynecological Diseases (BARBHER)
NCT04643197 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Different Types of Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia Versus Primary Abdominal Suturing
NCT05359510 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Versus Interrupted Abdominal Wall Closure After Emergency Midline Laparotomy
NCT00544583 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Barbed Suture for Emergency Midline Laparotomy Closure
NCT05351970 ·Status: COMPLETED