Titanium vs Absorbable Tacks for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT02076984 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2015-06-01
Summary
Background: Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias has gained popularity, since many studies and a recent meta-analysis have reported encouraging results and recurrence rates similar to open repair. The choice of the mesh and fixation methods is of paramount importance during laparoscopic approach, and nowadays, lightweight macropore meshes specifically designed for laparoscopic approach represent the first choice in several studies, due to the biomechanical properties and the optimal integration into the abdominal wall. No data with statistical relevance exist on the choice of fixation methods.
Primary end point of the present Italian multicentric prospective randomized trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two different tacks to fix the lightweight polypropylene mesh (Physiomesh™) during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: metallic spiral tacks (Protack™) vs absorbable "U" shaped tacks (Securestrap™)
Design of the Study: 200 patients with ventral hernia will be randomized into two groups:
Group A patients will be submitted to laparoscopic repair by Physiomesh fixed by Protack; Group B patients will be submitted to laparoscopic repair by Physiomesh fixed by Securestrap.
Blind randomization will be guaranteed by an on-line software with specific key access for every surgical unit participating in the study. Patients demographics and characteristics, preoperative studies, intraoperative and postoperative results and complications, as well as scheduled follow-up will be recorded and uploaded to the database. Data represented by continuous variables will be expressed as arithmetic mean +/- standard deviation. Other data will be expressed as geometric mean +/- 95% confidence interval. Data representing low incidence events will be expressed as number and percentage of occurrence for each group. Statistical significance for all analyses will be indicated by a p value of 0.05 or less.
Conditions
- Ventral Hernia
- Incisional Hernia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic incisional or ventral hernia repair
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Roma La Sapienza
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2015-12-31
- Completion
- 2018-12-31
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
AbsorbaTack Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Following Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
NCT00749268 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mesh Fixation Versus Non Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty
NCT06258317 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Mesh/Fixation Concepts for Laparoscopic Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02233569 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Trocar Site Incisional Hernia Prevention
NCT04699201 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02920307 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ventral Mesh Hernioplasty : Laparoscopic Versus Open Sublay
NCT06149858 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia - ReliaTack™ v ProTack™
NCT03434301 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Surgical Repair of Inguinal Hernia Using Sutured Repair Versus Tacker Use
NCT05574751 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prevention of Incisional Hernia With an Onlay Mesh Visible on MRI
NCT03105895 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic and Open Incisional Hernia Repair: a Multicenter Cohort Study
NCT01280370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Does a Transabdominal Plane Block Decrease Patient Pain After Ventral Hernia Repair?
NCT02007096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Prospective Study of the Use of a Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia After Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection
NCT01722565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Full-thickness Skin vs. Synthetic Mesh in the Repair of Large Incisional Hernia
NCT01413412 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Lichtenstein Versus TAPP and TEP in Groin Hernioplasty
NCT02928146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RCT Comparing Lightweight vs. Heavyweight Meshes in Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT04961346 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Risk of Recurrence After Incisional Hernia Repair With Mesh Fixation With Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Tacks
NCT01740882 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair With IPOM
NCT03283982 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT00138957 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retrospective Analysis on Large Incisional Hernia in High Risk Patients
NCT04801394 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic or Conventional Mesh Repair of Incisional and Umbilical Hernia
NCT00970515 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh in Incisional Hernia
NCT06197854 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Intraperitoneal Polypropylene Light Weight Wide Pore Soft Mesh Repair for Complex Ventral Hernia.
NCT03994588 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Mesh Implantation for the Prevention of Incisional Hernia
NCT01203553 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
NCT01592942 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Hybrid and Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02542085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA