Comparison Between Two Types of Meshes Used in Pelvic Organs Prolapse Procedures
NCT01645020 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 240
Last updated 2012-07-19
Summary
Using partially absorbed meshes in pelvic reconstructive surgery will involve fewer postoperative complications especially less pain caused by the mesh mass.
Conditions
- Postoperative Complications
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
M Neuman, MD
-
Menahem Neuman
Eligibility
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2008-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2013-01-31
- Completion
- 2013-06-30
Countries
- Israel
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT02383199 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Role of Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacropexy Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Female Genital Prolapse
NCT06720831 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
On-lay Versus Pre-peritoneal Hernioplasty in Incisional Lumbar Hernia
NCT06757998 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Non Absorbable Mesh Reinforcement of Midline Incision Closure in High Risk Patients, Onlay Versus Preperitoneal Position, a Comparative Clinical Trial
NCT04145908 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sacro-hysteropexy Using Proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Apical Prolapse
NCT05196542 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement for Stoma Closure
NCT06157645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair With Mesh,the Use of Absorbable Versus Non Absorbable Fixation Sutures
NCT01467830 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Perineal and Abdominal Reconstruction: a Comparison of Reconstructive Methodologies
NCT06800534 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Outcomes of Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Cystocele Repair: Comparisons of Uphold and Perigee Systems
NCT03764891 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ischia Spinous Fascia Fixation Procedure Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage III
NCT01670682 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
AbsorbaTack Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Following Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
NCT00749268 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Study to Compare Ventral Incisional Hernia by Laparoscopic vs Open Repair With Mesh
NCT00240188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
NCT01097200 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Does a Transabdominal Plane Block Decrease Patient Pain After Ventral Hernia Repair?
NCT02007096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Patient Perceived Pain and Satisfaction Between Lightweight and Heavyweight Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01638221 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pelvic Reconstruction
NCT03457883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Incisional Hernia Repair by Abdominal Wall Component Release With Contemporary Onlay Mesh Fixation
NCT06178965 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Fixation Versus Non Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty
NCT06258317 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Central and Anterior Compartment Prolapse Surgery: A Meshless Sacrocolpopexy Technique
NCT05558852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Closing the Gap on Postoperative Seroma and Recurrences in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT01719718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
NCT02231099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Using Vascularized Vaginal Flap on the Efficacy of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
NCT06494982 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flat Polypropylene Mesh in the Treatment of Uterine and Recurrent or Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06225375 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Early Surgical Outcomes in the Use of Hybrid Mesh for Incisional Hernia Repair: Results From a Multicenter Italian Study
NCT06166069 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Native Tissue Repair in Pelvic Organ Prolapse -Long-term Results and Risk of Re-operation
NCT06744972 ·Status: COMPLETED