Comparing Polyglactin vs Polypropylene Sutures for Rectus Sheath Closure
NCT07280975 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 156
Last updated 2025-12-15
Summary
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the outcomes of Polyglactin (Vicryl) versus Polypropylene (Prolene) sutures for rectus sheath closure in patients undergoing midline laparotomy. The study will evaluate the rates of incisional hernia, surgical site infection (SSI), wound dehiscence, chronic pain, and suture sinus formation. Participants aged 18-70 years, undergoing either elective or emergency laparotomy, will be randomly assigned to receive either Polyglactin or Polypropylene sutures. The primary outcome measure is the incidence of incisional hernia at 6 months, with secondary outcomes including SSI, wound complications, and chronic pain. The study is particularly important in the context of Pakistan, where such comparative data is limited, and aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimal suture material selection in general surgery.
Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Wound Dehiscence
- Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
- Incisional Hernia
- Rectus Sheath Closure
- Abdominal Surgery
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) Suture
Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) is an absorbable synthetic multifilament suture material used for rectus sheath closure following laparotomy. This suture material undergoes hydrolytic degradation over a period of 56-70 days and retains approximately 75% of its tensile strength at 2 weeks and 50% at 3 weeks, which aligns with the typical biological timeline for fascial healing. It is used to approximate the anterior rectus sheath with a continuous suturing technique.
- PROCEDURE
-
Polypropylene (Prolene) Suture
Polypropylene (Prolene) is a non-absorbable monofilament suture material used for rectus sheath closure following laparotomy. It provides long-term mechanical support for abdominal wall closure and does not degrade over time. The suture material maintains its tensile strength indefinitely and is known for its high biocompatibility, minimal tissue reaction, and resistance to infection due to its monofilament structure. It is applied using a continuous suturing technique.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-30
- Completion
- 2027-07-30
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Subcuticular Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery
NCT03536832 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery
NCT07078669 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT05966961 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS VERSUS INTERRUPTED-X SUTURING TECHNIQUE FOR CLOSURE OF RECTUS SHEATH IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING EMERGENCY LAPAROTOMY FOR HOLLOW VISCUS PERFORATION
NCT05632146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Composite Outcomes of Mesh vs Suture Techniques for Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Controlled Multicentre Trial
NCT02965313 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy
NCT03736811 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Continuous Versus Interrupted Suturing on Wound Dehiscence and Infection After Abdominal Surgery
NCT07241507 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Small-bite Versus Conventional Midline Fascial Closure in Abdominal Surgeries
NCT07340918 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect of Barbed Suture and Triclosan-coated Monofilament in Emergency Surgery
NCT03763279 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Use of Stratafix Symmetric™ to Prevent Incisional Hernia in Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Surgery
NCT06063577 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal Wall Closure With Triclosan-coated Suture
NCT01620294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Ostomy Primary Closure With 0.1% Betaine/Polyhexanide Wound Irrigation Compared to Pursestring Closure
NCT06309368 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Skin Incision Closure
NCT02459093 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison Between Maternal Complications of Chromic Catgut and Vicryl Rapid Sutures Used for Episiotomy Repair
NCT07073131 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Triclosan-antibacterial Sutures Impact on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Laparoscopic Surgeries.
NCT04255927 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Niche
NCT04307524 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Rapidly Absorbing Polyglactin 910 Versus Poliglecaprone 25 for Laceration Repair
NCT03184077 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wound Vac Polypropylene Suture Pilot Study
NCT02929238 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three Sutures With Different Absorption Rates for Lower Abdominal Incision
NCT05787171 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Closure vs Open Technique for Pilonidal Sinus
NCT07311707 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmetic Results With Tissue Adhesive vs. Subdermal Sutures in Cesarean Section
NCT06760026 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Barbed Suture vs Non-Barbed Closure for Emergency Exploratory Laparotomy RCT
NCT06043414 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Compare Suture Material in Closure of Uterine Incision in Cesarian Section
NCT02517710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
NCT00466648 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes Between Novel Tailored Transvaginal Mesh Surgery and Vaginal Native Tissue Repair Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT02465710 ·Status: UNKNOWN