MedTrace Logo

Feasibility of Velocity Loss-Based Volume Prescription During Constant-Load and Chain-Based Smith Machine Back Squats

NCT07719010 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 26

Last updated 2026-07-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this observational study was to evaluate the feasibility of percentage of velocity loss (%VL)-based approaches for prescribing training volume during constant-load and chain-based Smith machine back squats. The study aimed to answer whether %VL can be expressed as the maximum number of repetitions (%Rep) in constant-load and chain-based Smith machine squats. Twenty-six resistance-trained men performed repetitions-to-failure tests under variable (VRT) and constant resistance training (CRT). The %Rep attained before reaching different levels of effort were compared between VRT and CRT across various loads and sessions. Furthermore, this study evaluated the influence of different factors on the predictive accuracy of the %Rep-%VL relationships. These findings will provide evidence-based evidence in prescribing and monitoring intra-set volume.

Conditions

  • Loading Configuration
  • Levels of Effort

Interventions

OTHER

variable resistance training

Participants initially completed a standardized general warm-up and a specific warm-up. The specific warm-up protocol included 3 repetitions at approximately 40% 1RM, 2 repetitions at 65% 1RM, and 1 repetition at 90% 1RM using constant-load to ensure adequate neuromuscular activation for the subsequent testing sets. After a 3-minute rest, participants performed three sets to momentary muscular failure with 40% of total external loads provided by chains. To minimize fatigue from higher-repetition sets influencing the repetitions completed in subsequent loads, the loads were not tested in a randomized order. Instead, participants performed the tests in a descending order of 85%, 75%, and 65% 1RM.

OTHER

constant resistance training

Participants initially completed a standardized general warm-up and a specific warm-up. The specific warm-up protocol included 3 repetitions at approximately 40% 1RM, 2 repetitions at 65% 1RM, and 1 repetition at 90% 1RM using constant-load to ensure adequate neuromuscular activation for the subsequent testing sets. After a 3-minute rest, participants performed three sets to momentary muscular failure with 0% of total external loads provided by chains. To minimize fatigue from higher-repetition sets influencing the repetitions completed in subsequent loads, the loads were not tested in a randomized order. Instead, participants performed the tests in a descending order of 85%, 75%, and 65% 1RM.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • South China Normal University

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-10-07
Primary Completion
2026-01-10
Completion
2026-05-01

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07719010 on ClinicalTrials.gov