MedTrace Logo

Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life in Adults

NCT06107855 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2023-10-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aims of this study were to:

1. Compare the effects of low-dose Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training on untrained healthy adults' quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength.
2. Qualitatively explore perceptions of Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training.

Conditions

  • Quality of Life

Interventions

OTHER

Leg Press Resistance Training Machine

Participants used said unilateral leg press at 60% one-repetition max for either 3 sets x 5 reps, or 5 sets x 5 reps, at either maximal- or controlled-tempo-intent.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Northumbria University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Gill Barry, PhD · Northumbria University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
30 Years
Max Age
59 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-08-01
Primary Completion
2023-03-29
Completion
2023-03-29

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06107855 on ClinicalTrials.gov