Milled vs 3D-Printed Partial-Coverage Restorations in Endodontically Treated Molars
NCT07643311 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 142
Last updated 2026-06-11
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical performance of Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-milled and 3D-printed composite resin partial-coverage restorations in endodontically treated molars.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Do 3D-printed composite resin partial-coverage restorations show similar clinical performance compared with CAD/CAM-milled composite resin restorations?
* Are there differences in survival, success rates, and complications between the two types of restorations over a 3-year follow-up period?
Researchers will compare CAD/CAM-milled composite resin restorations with 3D-printed composite resin restorations to evaluate their clinical performance.
Participants will:
* Receive a partial-coverage restoration (onlay or overlay) in an endodontically treated molar.
* Be randomly assigned to receive either a CAD/CAM-milled or a 3D-printed composite resin restoration.
* Attend follow-up visits at 12, 24, and 36 months.
* Undergo clinical evaluations by two blinded evaluators using the revised FDI criteria and standardized photographic documentation.
Conditions
- Endodontically Treated Teeth
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Milled Composite Resin Onlay/Overlay Restoration
Indirect partial coverage restoration fabricated from milled composite resin blocks (HC Block, Shofu, Japan) and adhesively cemented on endodontically treated molars.
- DEVICE
-
3D-Printed Composite Resin Onlay/Overlay Restoration
Indirect partial coverage restoration fabricated from 3D-printed composite resin (Rodin Sculpture, Pac-Dent, USA) and adhesively cemented on endodontically treated molars.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospital San Jose
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Tomás Yoma Galleguillos, DDS · Hospital San José, Santiago, Chile
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-29
- Primary Completion
- 2030-05-31
- Completion
- 2030-06-30
Countries
- Chile
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of 3D Printed Versus CAD/CAM Milled Onlays
NCT06774560 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Fit of 3D-Printed Versus Milled Endocrowns: An 18-Month Trial
NCT07708077 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Printed Hybrid Resin in Indirect Restorations
NCT07465978 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of 3D-Printed Versus Semi-Direct Composite Resin Restorations
NCT07676929 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetic Outcome of 3D Printed Hybrid Ceramics as Final Restorations for Single Screw Retained Implant.
NCT07154602 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Reinforced 3D-Printed Versus Direct Bulk-Filled Resin Composites for Restoring Extensive Class II Cavities in Vital Molars
NCT07429747 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Additive vs Subtractive Manufacturing for Endocrown Fabrication: A 24-Month RCT
NCT07633574 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Resin Crowns vs Stainless Steel Crowns in Pulpotomized Primary Molars.
NCT07648979 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Bioactive Composite vs Hall Technique for Proximal Cavities in Primary Molars
NCT07552129 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Clinical Performance of Partial Restorations Fabricated With Three-Dimensional Printer and CAD-CAM
NCT07031856 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bioceramic Putty Versus MTA in Pulpotomized Primary Teeth to be Covered With 3D Printed Resin Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crown
NCT07344038 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Composite Versus Indirect Hybrid Resin Restorations in Hypomineralized First Permanent Molars
NCT07718191 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Inlays Versus Resin Composite Inlays in Vital Molars With Extensive Occluso-Proximal Cavities
NCT07648485 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetics of Dental Composite and Adhesive System
NCT03716349 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods
NCT06227390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing CAD/CAM vs Composite for Carious Hypomineralized Molars Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Both Treatments.
NCT07049016 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Bulk-Fill Composite of Posterior Restorations
NCT03230604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Patients Risk Factors on the Longevity of Aesthetic Restorations
NCT03834636 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Evaluation of Additive and Subtractive Onlay Restorations
NCT07195201 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Versus Indirect Endocrowns on Endodontically Treated Molars
NCT06934460 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Bioactive Composites vs RMGI for Proximal Cavities in Primary Molars
NCT07561216 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Composite Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars With or Without Pulpotomy. Prospective 24 Month Clinical Trial.
NCT07243496 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Ceromer Crowns Versus Stainless Steel in Posterior Primary Molars
NCT07091331 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA