Composite Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars With or Without Pulpotomy. Prospective 24 Month Clinical Trial.
NCT07243496 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2025-11-24
Summary
After 24 months:
* Investigation of the success rate of Class II composite resin restorations in primary molars that have undergone pulpotomy.
* Comparison of Class II composite resin restorations in primary molars that have undergone pulpotomy with restorations of the same type in the same patient, in which no pulpotomy has been performed.
The null hypothesis of the study is that there is no statistically significant difference in the success of Class II resin restorations after their placement in primary molars, regardless of whether a pulpotomy has been performed or not.
Conditions
- Composite Restoration
- Primary Tooth Pulpotomy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Class II restoration after pulpotomy
The same dentist performs all restorations. All treatments are carried out using a rubber dam and the appropriate local anesthesia. After pulpotomy completion with a layer of MTA®, an intermediate layer of glass ionomer cement (Vitrebond Plus™) is placed before the final composite resin restoration. Class II resin restorations are performed after complete caries removal, placement of a partial matrix, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds, bonding with a 4th-generation adhesive agent (Prime n Bond NT, Dentsply™), and placement of composite resin (Filtek Universal™, 3M™).
- PROCEDURE
-
Class II restoration without pulpotomy
The same dentist performs all restorations. All treatments are carried out using a rubber dam and the appropriate local anesthesia. Class II resin restorations are performed after complete caries removal, placement of a partial matrix, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds, bonding with a 4th-generation adhesive agent (Prime n Bond NT, Dentsply™), and placement of composite resin (Filtek Universal™, 3M™).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Lygidakis Dental Clinic
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 3 Years
- Max Age
- 9 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-05-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-05-01
- Completion
- 2026-05-01
Countries
- Greece
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Direct Versus Indirect Endocrowns on Endodontically Treated Molars
NCT06934460 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Restorations in Deciduous Anterior Teeth
NCT05875064 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Performance of Alkasite-based Restorations in Children
NCT07263555 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Can Repair Increase the Useful Life of Composite Resins?
NCT02043873 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Restoring of Primary Molars
NCT07239154 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars
NCT06724939 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success Rate of Pulpotomy Versus Pulpectomy for Management of Primary Teeth With Deep Caries
NCT06293521 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Assessment of Glass Ionomer Restorations With and Without Prior Application of Nano Silver Fluoride in Occlusal Carious Molars Treated With Partial Caries Removal Technique
NCT03193606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Assessment of Glass Carbomer Cement
NCT03030690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Indirect Full Coverage Restorations Compared to Direct Composite Resin Restorations
NCT04249726 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sealing Microcavitated Carious Lesions
NCT02849925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Restorative Treatment in First Molars Affected by Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization
NCT02717286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Patients Risk Factors on the Longevity of Aesthetic Restorations
NCT03834636 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Universal Flowable Composite in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT05263089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bulk-fill Restorations in Class II Cavities
NCT06461364 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of HVGIC vs Bulk Fill Composite in Class II Cavities of Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month RCT
NCT07067164 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Flowable Composites on Postoperative Sensitivity in Class I Restorations.
NCT07343050 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of Intracanal Reinforcement with Short Composite Post in Upper Primary Incisors with Severly Carious Teeth As in Early Childhood Caries Cases Using Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06740643 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Post-operative Sensitivity in Composite Restorations
NCT06092567 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA