Injectable Bioactive Composites vs RMGI for Proximal Cavities in Primary Molars
NCT07561216 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2026-05-01
Summary
This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of injectable bioactive composite (Beautifil Flow Plus X, Shofu) versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer (RMGI) in restoring proximal cavities (Class II) in primary molars of children aged 3-8 years over a 12-month follow-up period, using revised FDI criteria.
Conditions
- Dental Caries
Interventions
- OTHER
-
giomer
restoration of proximal cavities in primary molars using an injectable bioactive composite (Giomer) material. Cavities will be prepared following minimally invasive principles, isolated appropriately, and restored according to the manufacturer's instructions using adhesive bonding. Clinical performance will be evaluated in terms of retention, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, and overall restoration success during the follow-up period.
- OTHER
-
RMGI
Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer (RMGI) is a fluoride-releasing restorative material used for the restoration of carious primary teeth. It combines the properties of conventional glass ionomer cement with resin components to improve mechanical strength, adhesion, and moisture tolerance. In this study, RMGI will be used for restoring cavitated carious lesions in primary teeth following caries removal according to minimally invasive dentistry principles.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Nadine Elshayal · Cairo University
-
Dina Ez Mohamed · Cairo University
-
Osama Elshahawy · Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 3 Years
- Max Age
- 8 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-30
- Completion
- 2027-09-30
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of the Indirect Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth
NCT04561167 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative vs. RMGI in Class V: A Randomized Control Trial
NCT03771196 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Organically Modified Ceramic Resin Composite Versus Bulkfill Resin in Proximal Posterior Cavities
NCT04677023 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injection-Molding Vs. Incremental Packing of Resin Composite in Cavitated Posterior Teeth
NCT05020093 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Resistance Of Bioactive With And Without Etching Vs. Conventional Resin-Based Fissure Sealants
NCT07018141 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed Ceramic-Filled Photopolymer Resin Vs. CAD/CAM Resin Composite Overlays for Restoration of Extensively Damaged Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth. An 18-month Follow-up
NCT07378982 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07003360 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sealing of Initial Occlusal Caries Using Fissure Sealants
NCT05891288 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Success of Bulk Fil Composite Versus Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer in Primary Class II Molars
NCT06235489 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fluoride Release,Compressive Strength and Clinical Performance of a Bioactive Restorative Material in ART
NCT03788616 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Primary Molars Restorations With Encapsulated or Hand-Mixed Glass Ionomer: Clinical Trial
NCT02274142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Resin Based and Glass Ionomer Based Hydrophilic Fissure Sealants
NCT05127343 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Obturation Quality in Primary Molars
NCT06157021 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reminerlization Potential of Innovative Biomimetic Material in Caries White Spot Lesions
NCT03823612 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Performance of a Flowable Bulk Fill Composite Versus a Highly Viscous Glass-ionomer Cement in Primary Molars
NCT06166160 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Fluoride Varnish Versus Resin Based Sealant
NCT04603573 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pre-etched Bioactive Versus Resin- Based Fissure Sealant for Permanent Molars Affected With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH): a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07504614 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity Using Bioactive Cement Incementation of Indirect Composite Blocks
NCT04557657 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns Versus Conventional Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05337358 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Wear Resistance and Bioactivity of Self Cured Bioactive Resin Composite
NCT07262086 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Compariing a Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant To A Conventional Resin
NCT04052802 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Sealants vs Conventional Sealants in Permanent Molars
NCT03779893 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Evaluation of Glass Ionomer Sealant Versus Resin Sealant for Pits and Fissures of the First Permanent Molars
NCT05988801 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA