Clinical Performance of Two Bulk-Fill Composite of Posterior Restorations
NCT03230604 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 142
Last updated 2022-05-18
Summary
To minimize the effects of polymerization shrinkage in the restorative treatment, there are new composites called Bulk- Fill which the companies has developed this composites for example Tetric N Ceram(Ivoclar-Vivadent) and Filtek ( 3M ESPE). Its decreased polymerization shrinkage and properties allow the material to be inserted in one layer being quickly than traditional composite. This clinical study is designed to compare the clinical performance of the bulk fill composite resin in Class I (one-surface posterior), II (two-surface posterior) and V (cervical-surface posterior) fillings.
Conditions
- Post Dental Restoration
- Caries, Dental
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Filtek Bulk Fill Composite and Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill Composite
Restorative cavities one, two and five with material Filtek Bulk Fill Composite
- DEVICE
-
Z 350 Xt Composite
Restorative cavities one, two and five with material Z 350 XT Composite
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universidad Nacional Andres Bello
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Odontologia · Universidad Andres Bello
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2017-07-24
- Completion
- 2021-12-01
Countries
- Chile
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using Snow Plow Versus Oscillating Packing Technique
NCT07033650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Posterior Restorations: Amalgam vs Resin Composite
NCT02393989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns Versus Conventional Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05337358 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria.
NCT05180903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Basic Filling Material in Class I and II Posterior Restorations
NCT02763085 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Success of Bulk Fil Composite Versus Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer in Primary Class II Molars
NCT06235489 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations
NCT05499494 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Resin Composite Restorations
NCT05418400 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns
NCT06348979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite Versus Conventionally Bonded Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions
NCT04888676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT06260644 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations
NCT06183320 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Organically Modified Ceramic Resin Composite Versus Bulkfill Resin in Proximal Posterior Cavities
NCT04677023 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Sonic Fill and X-tra Fill in Clinical Performance
NCT04926883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
NCT03283280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07003360 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Analysis of Biomaterials for Retrograde Filling in Apical Surgery.
NCT07246512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Resin Composite Restorations With PBE
NCT03832829 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Wear Resistance and Bioactivity of Self Cured Bioactive Resin Composite
NCT07262086 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Endocrowns vs.Ceramic Onlays Used in Endodontically Treated Teeth- Randomized Clinical Study
NCT03064516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Class II Posterior Composite Restorations
NCT02858947 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of a Chemically Activated Composite Resin Alkasite in Atypical Caries Lesions of Deciduous Teeth
NCT04195386 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Hypersensitivity and Digital Radiographic Assessment of a Zinc Modified Versus a Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement in Deep Carious Lesion: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT03285022 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA