Clinical Evaluation of 3D Printed Versus CAD/CAM Milled Onlays
NCT06774560 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2025-01-14
Summary
The digital workflow in dentistry has proven in the past decades to be a time-efficient, multifunctional, effortless, and accessible approach. The inherited shortages milling machines represented by the incapability to produce accurate complex hollow structures may give preference to modern 3D ceramic printing.
Computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in dentistry is a digital subtractive approach for manufacturing indirect restorations. Nevertheless, waste materials and milling burs wearing are considered as key disadvantages of CAD/CAM technology, and are the main drive to improve 3D printing technology (additive manufacturing) as the latter has shown considerable efficiency in minimising wasted materials.
Although additive manufacturing has been known since the 1980s, its application in dentistry is relatively new and not fully studied with limited research and in vivo studies on their clinical performance.
Conditions
- Badly Decayed Molars
Interventions
- OTHER
-
CAD/Cam milled onlays
The digital workflow in dentistry has proven in the past decades to be a time-efficient, multifunctional, effortless, and accessible approach. The inherited shortages milling machines represented by the incapability to produce accurate complex hollow structures may give preference to modern 3D ceramic printing. Computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in dentistry is a digital subtractive approach for manufacturing indirect restorations. Nevertheless, waste materials and milling burs wearing are considered as key disadvantages of CAD/CAM technology, and are the main drive to improve 3D printing technology (additive manufacturing) as the latter has shown considerable efficiency in minimising wasted materials.
- OTHER
-
3D printed onlays
3D printing technologies are developing more intensively in dentistry as this technology has the capacity to produce shapes or models with high accuracy and in a short time. This method of fabrication takes less time and money and saves on materials compared to CAD/CAM. Although it seems that digital manufacturing technology has made great changes in the restorative dentistry field, this technology is still not fully in use. This is possibly because of the lack of studies and research on this technology, particularly in terms of clinical performance and patient-centred outcomes. 3D printing technologies are novel technologies with a lack of research; therefore, the processing of 3D printing materials is still controversial.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 25 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-01
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Polymethyl Methacrylate CAD/CAM Crowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06113770 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Resin Composite Restoration of Primary Anterior Teeth Using Custom 3D Printed Templates
NCT06478004 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations
NCT05954156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Different Management Techniques for Extensive Molar Defects in Patients Suffering From MIH
NCT04209920 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Onlay Restorations After Cervical Margin Relocation (CMR)
NCT06155773 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Alkasite-based Restorations in Children
NCT07263555 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Crowns Versus Prefabricated Crowns on Primary Teeth
NCT06305845 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Custom-Made Zirconia Crowns and 3D-Printed Resin Crowns Versus Ready-Made Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06581510 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Composite Coronal Build -Up in Mutilated Primary Incisors: 3 Years Results
NCT04758221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Three Different Minimally Invasive Techniques for Management of Enamel Opacities in Patients With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization "Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial"
NCT06135272 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Preparation Time Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
NCT06968767 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing CAD/CAM vs Composite for Carious Hypomineralized Molars Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Both Treatments.
NCT07049016 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Long-Term Success of Different CAD-CAM Blocks Used as Indirect Restorations in Molar Incisor Hypomineralized Teeth: A Split Mouth Study
NCT07144605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement
NCT06195449 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Molars Restoration Using Different Pediatric Crowns.
NCT04144062 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Cad-cam Fabricated Ceramic Restoration in Teeth Affected With MIH
NCT05434884 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Contact Tightness of Zirconomer Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Occlusoproximal Cavities in Molars
NCT06596707 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative
NCT06254053 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Permanent Molars Affected With Molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH) Among a Group of Egyptian Children Using Composite Restorations or Preformed Metal Crowns
NCT04369768 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Indirect Full Coverage Restorations Compared to Direct Composite Resin Restorations
NCT04249726 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Digital vs Prefab Crowns for Pulpotomized Primary Molars
NCT06733909 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
CAD-CAM or Adhesive Approaches for MIH Treatment
NCT06456619 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA