Clinical Performance and Fit of 3D-Printed Versus Milled Endocrowns: An 18-Month Trial
NCT07708077 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 52
Last updated 2026-07-21
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether 3D-printed resin composite endocrowns perform as well as milled resin composite endocrowns in restoring endodontically treated teeth. It will also learn how well the restorations fit over time.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do 3D-printed endocrowns and milled endocrowns show different clinical performance? Do 3D-printed endocrowns and milled endocrowns differ in restoration fit over 18 months?
Researchers will compare two fabrication methods:
Additive manufacturing: 3D-printed resin composite endocrowns. Subtractive manufacturing: milled resin composite endocrowns.
Participants will:
Be recruited from the Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University.
Receive tooth preparation after confirmation of satisfactory root canal treatment.
Have their teeth prepared using standardized endocrown guidelines by one calibrated operator.
Have digital scans taken of the prepared tooth, opposing arch, and bite registration.
Have restorations designed digitally and then assigned randomly to one of the two groups.
Receive a temporary restoration until the final endocrown is ready.
Have the final restoration tried in for fit, contacts, and occlusion before cementation.
Have a baseline post-cementation scan taken for fit assessment.
Return for follow-up visits at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months.
Be evaluated at each visit using Modified FDI criteria and 3D digital superimposition for fit analysis.
Conditions
- Clinical Performance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Endocrowns
- Restoration Fit of Endodontically Treated Teeth With Endocrowns
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Milled resin composite restorations fabricated using subtractive manufacturing from CAD/CAM blocks.
Subtractive Manufacturing, the control group will utilize restorations fabricated via subtractive manufacturing, specifically by milling from industrially fabricated blocks of nanohybrid composite. This method is the established gold standard for producing CAD/CAM resin composite restorations. It is known for creating restorations with excellent mechanical properties, high density, and predictable clinical performance due to the optimized, industrial-grade polymerization of the blocks. These materials, which include polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (PICNs) and resin nanoceramics, were developed to combine the favorable properties of both ceramics and resin composites, offering a biomimetic alternative to traditional glass-ceramics.
- OTHER
-
Three dimensionally (3D) printed resin composite restorations fabricated using additive manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing, the intervention group will feature restorations fabricated via 3D printing. This technology is more time and cost-efficient, more accurate, and could provide a considerable alternative to the currently applied CNC milling, reduced material waste, and the ability to create complex geometries with high precision. Recent studies have shown that 3D-printed restorations can achieve promising results in terms of marginal and internal fit, which are critical for clinical longevity. This has spurred the development of novel, ceramic-filled hybrid materials specifically engineered for permanent 3D-printed restorations. Manufacturers of these materials claim high dimensional stability, flexural strength, and a modulus suitable for definitive restorations (e.g., Bego; VarseoSmile Triniq technical product data sheet). However, there is a lack of clinical data to support these claims.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
October 6 University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mohsen Hussein Abielhassan, • Professor, Conservative Dent · October 6 University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-11-01
- Primary Completion
- 2028-11-01
- Completion
- 2028-12-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Esthetic Outcome of 3D Printed Hybrid Ceramics as Final Restorations for Single Screw Retained Implant.
NCT07154602 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Two-Year Clinical Performance of Self-Cured Resin Composite in Comparison to Light-Cured Bioactive Resin Composite in Restoring Occlusal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT07480070 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Reinforced 3D-Printed Versus Direct Bulk-Filled Resin Composites for Restoring Extensive Class II Cavities in Vital Molars
NCT07429747 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Provisional Restoration Type on Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement and Loading
NCT07700771 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Resin Composite Restoration of Primary Anterior Teeth Using Custom 3D Printed Templates
NCT06478004 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07003360 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of the Indirect Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth
NCT04561167 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns Versus Conventional Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05337358 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of High Performance Polymer PEEK Endocrown Using Two Preparation Designs
NCT06500845 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars
NCT06000085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Crowns Versus Prefabricated Stainless-Steel Crowns for Intermediate Restoration of Compromised First Permanent Molars
NCT06047925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioceramic Putty Versus MTA in Pulpotomized Primary Teeth to be Covered With 3D Printed Resin Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crown
NCT07344038 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Crowns Versus Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06068244 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reminerlization Potential of Innovative Biomimetic Material in Caries White Spot Lesions
NCT03823612 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT03515265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of 3D Printed Composite Resin Crowns With Stainless Steel Crowns
NCT06161103 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Compariing a Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant To A Conventional Resin
NCT04052802 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of 3D Printed Versus CAD/CAM Milled Onlays
NCT06774560 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods
NCT06227390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity Using Bioactive Cement Incementation of Indirect Composite Blocks
NCT04557657 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1