Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32
Last updated 2023-08-23
Summary
In patients with endodontically treated teeth, will the Indirect Milled composite Endo-crown restorations have a better clinical performance and more wear resistance than the Direct Bulk-Fill resin composite restorations over one year?
Primary Objective: To evaluate clinical performance of different Techniques of Composite Restorations (Indirect restorations using a CAD/CAM grinding process, BRILLIANT Crios, Coltène/Whaledent AG, Switzerland or Direct a light-cured, bulk-fill nanocomposite restorative material, Filtek™ One Bulk Fill Restorative, 3M ESPE Dental Products, USA) in Endodontically treated posterior teeth.
Conditions
- Endodontically Treated Teeth
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Reinforced composite for the fabrication of permanent, indirect restorations using a CAD/CAM grinding process.
Shock-absorbing effect due to the dentine-like modulus of elasticity makes BRILLIANT Crios extremely well suited for implant restorations.it is composed of dental glass (barium glass ˂ 1.0 μm), amorphous silica (Sio2 ˂ 20 nm), resin matrix (cross-linked methacrylates) and pigments
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Esraa Es Hussien · Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Max Age
- 55 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-10-22
- Primary Completion
- 2022-04-18
- Completion
- 2023-04-28
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite Versus Conventionally Bonded Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions
NCT04888676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity Using Bioactive Cement Incementation of Indirect Composite Blocks
NCT04557657 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
NCT03283280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injection-Molding Vs. Incremental Packing of Resin Composite in Cavitated Posterior Teeth
NCT05020093 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns
NCT06348979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars
NCT06000085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compariing a Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant To A Conventional Resin
NCT04052802 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Resin Composite Restorations
NCT05418400 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Organically Modified Ceramic Resin Composite Versus Bulkfill Resin in Proximal Posterior Cavities
NCT04677023 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Simplified-Shade Nano-Hybrid Composite With Full-Coverage Silane Coating and High-Performance Pulverized Fillers
NCT07334509 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Cavities: A Clinical Trial
NCT06673888 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study of Different Traditional and Bioactive Indirect Pulp Capping Materials
NCT06707311 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Study Aims to Compare the Effectiveness of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-containing Adhesives vs Conventional Universal Adhesives on the Clinical Performance Composite Restorations Through Promoting Dentin Remineralization After Selective Caries Removal Over a Two-year Follow-up
NCT06990945 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Performance of Self Adhesive Giomer Containing Flowable Composite in Restoring Class V Cavities
NCT04944485 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of High Performance Polymer PEEK Endocrown Using Two Preparation Designs
NCT06500845 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Stainless Steel Crowns Versus Bulkfill Composite Resin for Restoring Primary Molars After Endodontic Treatment
NCT03186950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Success of Bulk Fil Composite Versus Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer in Primary Class II Molars
NCT06235489 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flowable Resin Composite: Two-Year Clinical Performance in Class I Restorations
NCT07330193 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Resin Based and Glass Ionomer Based Hydrophilic Fissure Sealants
NCT05127343 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations
NCT05499494 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT06260644 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT04152460 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Light Cured Resin Modified Calcium Silicate Versus Light Cured Calcium Hydroxide in Indirect Pulp Treatment of Primary Molars
NCT03791255 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With a Self-adhesive, Self-etch or a Conventional Resin Cement
NCT04848987 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Indirect Pulp Treatment in Primary Molars
NCT03770871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4