Supine vs. Prone PCNL for Large Renal Stones: A Randomized Trial in Yemen.
NCT07627503 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 140
Last updated 2026-06-05
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the safety, cost-effectiveness, and patient recovery of two different surgical positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in adults aged 18 to 70 years who have kidney stones larger than 2 cm. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does the supine (lying on the back) surgical position result in fewer early postoperative complications than the traditional prone (lying on the stomach) position?
* Does the supine position reduce the total surgery time, direct hospital costs, and postoperative pain?
Researchers will compare patients assigned to undergo PCNL in the supine position to those assigned to the prone position to see if the supine approach offers a safer, more cost-effective, and more comfortable recovery.
Participants will:
* Undergo standard PCNL surgery to remove their kidney stones in either the supine or prone position.
* Have their pain levels, surgery time, and any early surgical complications monitored during their hospital stay.
* Complete brief questionnaires regarding their overall surgical satisfaction and quality of life at 1 month and 3 months after the procedure.
Conditions
- Kidney Calculi
- Nephrolithiasis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
Standard PCNL performed with the patient in the supine position using a standard 24-30 Fr tract.
- PROCEDURE
-
Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
Standard PCNL performed with the patient in the traditional prone position using a standard 24-30 Fr tract.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sana'a University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Waleed M Al-Ata, M.B.B.Ch · Al-Kuwait University Hospital
-
Khaled M Al-Kohlany, Associate Professor · Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana'a University
-
Abualgaith A Alkholany, MD · Al-Kuwait University Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-01
- Completion
- 2027-06-30
Countries
- Yemen
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Supine Versus Prone PNL in Pediatric
NCT06012864 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Prone Flexed Position in Percutanous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04345835 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PCNL Versus Standard-PCNL For The Management of 20-40 mm Size Kidney Stones
NCT02635048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of SMP on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo
NCT02760134 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Standard-PCNL vs Mini-PCNL vs Super-mini PCNL for the Treatment of ≥2 cm Renal Stone
NCT03771365 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones
NCT07589153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Different Treatment Modalities for Lower Pole and Renal Pelvis Stones
NCT02522676 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
The Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Not Indwelling of Ureteral Stents in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06455618 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
High Supracostal Versus Subcostal Puncture in Adult PCNL
NCT06350045 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effects of Abdominal Cushion on PCNL in Prone Position
NCT03797027 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Pneumatic Versus Ultra-sonic Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Large Kidney Stones
NCT02751281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Hemodynamic Effects of Surgical Position in Prone vs. Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT07138872 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones
NCT06175910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ultra-mini PCNL and Micro PCNL
NCT02522689 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL for Distal Ureteric Stone: Supine Versus Prone
NCT02298465 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Guided PCNL Versus Standard PCNL
NCT04825353 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Suction Mini-PCNL Versus Standard PCNL for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT05088213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life in Kidney Stone Patients Undergoing Surgery
NCT02625051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones
NCT03206515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Application of One-handed Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT05661175 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Do We Really Bleed in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Single-Surgeon, Single-Center Experience
NCT07360795 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Tubeless Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for Renal Stones
NCT07522619 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02519634 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA