Effectiveness of US-Guided PCNL Different Positions in Renal Stones Treatment
NCT05855057 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 123
Last updated 2023-05-11
Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous nephrolithotomyin different positions supine, prone positions and flank suspend supine position in renal stones treatment.
Conditions
- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
- Renal Stones
- Ultrasound Therapy; Complications
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Flank suspended supine position percutaneous nephrolithotomy
The patients will be placed in the supine position with the shoulder and the buttock will be raised by a 3-l bag of water suspending the flank of the affected side. The body contour will be aligned to the edge of the table. The operating table will be adjusted to the jack knife position, with the tip of the lower part of the table will be slightly lowered. The leg of the affected side of the patent will be straightened dorsally flexed and slightly inner rotated, with the knee of the other side will be flexed. The patients will be then immobilized at the chest and the pelvis with two adherent tapes which crossed each other at the abdomen to form a 'V' shape.
- PROCEDURE
-
Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy group
The patient will remain in the supine position, with the side of interest at the edge of the table, with a small cushion placed under the flank to elevate it 15-20°.
- PROCEDURE
-
Prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy group
Prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The prone position (PRON) technique followed these classic steps: patients will be placed in a lithotomy position and a ureteral catheter will be inserted through a rigid cystoscope to perform a retrograde pyelogram. The ureteral catheter will be fixed to a Foley catheter, and then the patient will be repositioned to the prone position with pads under their shoulders.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Benha University
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-01-20
- Primary Completion
- 2022-01-20
- Completion
- 2022-01-20
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Erector Spinae Versus Paravertebral in Pediatric PCNL
NCT05589649 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Narrow Focus (F1) Versus Wide Focus (F3) of Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) for Renal Calculi
NCT04759599 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Single Use Flexible Ureteroscopes in Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT04578795 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones
NCT06175910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
NCT06624306 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04869969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT03105206 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparing Pneumatic Versus Ultra-sonic Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Large Kidney Stones
NCT02751281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Ultraslow Full-power SWL Versus Slow Power-ramping SWL in Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03763539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Ureteroscopy and Ureteric Stones
NCT03404986 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasonic vs. Fluoroscopic Guided PNL in Pediatric Renal Stones
NCT03250559 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in the Reverse Trendelenburg Position for Upper Ureteral Stones
NCT04894058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Supine Versus Prone PNL in Pediatric
NCT06012864 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Guided PCNL Versus Standard PCNL
NCT04825353 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Ureteral Catheterization Is Not Essential in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06750913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy As Primary Treatment in Renal Stones 2-3 Cm
NCT06892626 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Us vs Fluoroscopic Guided Renal Access
NCT04090255 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard PCNL Vs Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) for Complex Nephrolithiasis in Obese Patients
NCT06085794 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of POCUS and STONE Criteria Together in the Diagnosis of Nephrolithiasis
NCT07126847 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Fluoroscopic Guided vs US-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy for the Treatment of Stone Disease
NCT04606758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral Synchronous Simultaneous Stone Surgery
NCT03599297 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA