Quality of Life in Kidney Stone Patients Undergoing Surgery
NCT02625051 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2021-08-06
Summary
This is a prospective randomized study, comparing quality of life in renal stone patients undergoing surgical treatment with ureteroscopy (URS) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).
Conditions
- Kidney Calculi
- Quality of Life
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Ureteroscopy
Under general anesthesia, the patient is placed in the lithotomy position. All procedures are performed under direct videoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. Fluoroscopic screening is utilized using a mobile multidirectional C-arm fluoroscopy unit. A safety guide-wire is then placed into renal pelvis, followed by a ureteral access sheath to maintain low intra-renal pressure, and to facilitate the procedures. Using flexible ureteroscope, renal or proximal ureteral stone is identified and fragmented with a holmium laser. Basket extraction of residual fragments is done until visual complete clearance of stone fragments is achieved.
- PROCEDURE
-
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Under general anesthesia, an open-ended 5 french ureteral exchange catheter is placed into the ipsilateral ureter under cystoscopic guidance. The patient is then safely turned and secured in the prone position. Percutaneous renal access is obtained under ultrasonographic or fluoroscopic guidance. Either a 24 or 30 french sheath is advanced in the kidney and nephroscopy is performed with a rigid offset nephroscope. Stone fragmentation is accomplished using a dual CyberWand lithotripter or holmium laser lithotripsy. Flexible nephroscopy is performed to look for possible residual fragments and basket extraction is done for complete clearance of stone.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
collaborator NIH -
University of California, San Francisco
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Thomas Chi, MD · University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2019-06-30
- Completion
- 2019-06-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparing Pneumatic Versus Ultra-sonic Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Large Kidney Stones
NCT02751281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Ambulatory Versus Inpatient Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04690010 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Pain Before and After Removal of Non-obstructive Kidney Stones
NCT03657667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT02645058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Total Nephrectomy on Patients With Kidney Stone
NCT01235104 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Primary Ureteroscopy for Acute Obstructive Nephropathy Due to Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Non-randomized Feasibility and Safety Trial
NCT07177313 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones
NCT06175910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of RIRS Versus PCNL Methods, According to Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Demand in 2 to 4 cm Renal Stones
NCT02430168 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Different Treatment Options for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT03614247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02519634 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Determinants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRS
NCT05851339 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
7.5F Versus 9.2F Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of 1-2cm Renal Calculi on Postoperative Infection
NCT05231577 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT03105206 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy As Primary Treatment in Renal Stones 2-3 Cm
NCT06892626 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Unimodal Bilateral Flexible Ureteroscopy.
NCT05591716 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Different Diameter fURSs With Similar RESDs for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT06987760 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Previously Placed Nephrostomy Tract (NT) Versus Single Stage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
NCT00907946 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones
NCT03206515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA