Transurethral Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Management of Bladder Stones in Boys
NCT03294239 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2020-09-01
Summary
To compare safety and efficacy of trans urethral and per cutaneous approaches in endoscopic management of bladder stones in boys younger than 14 years
Conditions
- Pediatric Bladder Stones
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Transurethral extraction of bladder stone(s)
Patients will have transurethral approach for management of their bladder stones. Either pneumatic or Holmium:YAG laser will be used for stone distentegration. Stone basket and/or Elics current evacuation will be used to retrieve stone fragments. Urethral catheter will be applied for 48 hours.
- PROCEDURE
-
percutaneous extraction of bladder stone(s)
Patients will have percutaneous approach for management of their bladder stones. After initial cystoscopy a Foley's urethral catheter will be fixed for continuous irrigation. Then, the bladder will be filled to capacity with normal saline. Access to the distended bladder will be obtained by 10-gauge needle in the midline 1-2 cm above the pubic bone. Once suitable placement is confirmed with return of fluid, a guide wire will be passed through the needle into the bladder. Dilatation will be done using 8-10 Fr coaxial dilators then single fascial dilator with placement of 16 Fr Amplatz sheath as a working tract. No ultrasonic or fluoroscopic guidance will be used. Stone basket will be used to extract the stone. If the stones were larger than the used sheath, disintegration will be performed with a pneumatic lithotrite. Primary skin closure of the suprapubic stab wound by one stitch will be done and the urethral catheter will remain for 48 hours.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assiut University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 1 Month
- Max Age
- 14 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2020-08-01
- Completion
- 2020-09-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ultrasonic vs. Fluoroscopic Guided PNL in Pediatric Renal Stones
NCT03250559 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy and Safety of Medical Expulsive Therapy After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT05759767 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Delayed or Direct Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Pediatric Calcular Anuria
NCT02139059 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficacy of Mini-PCNLversus RIRS for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculus (1-2.5 cm)
NCT06031103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Ureteroscopy and Ureteric Stones
NCT03404986 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optical Motion Capture-Assisted Ultrasound for Pediatric ESWL
NCT07299032 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Supine Mini-PCNL and Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) for Dense Lower Calyceal Stones (1-2 cm) in School-Age Pediatric Patients
NCT07345234 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Large Pediatric Renal Pelvic Stone Burden More Than 2 cm
NCT05293613 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Intra-Ureteric Aminophylline Installation After Failed Stone Accessibility by Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy. Prospective Trial
NCT06728943 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Versus SWL and Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT) For Paediatrics Radiolucent Renal Stone
NCT05896345 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using Fluoroscopic Versus Ultrasonic Localization
NCT05413603 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Visual Cystolitholapaxy in The Management of Patients Presenting With Calcular Acute Urinary Retention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT02594631 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effectiveness of Single Use Flexible Ureteroscopes in Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT04578795 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Versus Ultrasonic Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Stones
NCT01922414 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT03932370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Ureteric Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03795545 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome of URS in Fresh Versus Recurrent Cases of Stone Ureter
NCT06592469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
A Prospective Observational Comparison of SMP and ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm in Children (IAU-04)
NCT04317443 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Efficacy of Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and Combined ESWL and ODT as Non-Invasive Modalities for Treating Small and Medium-Sized Radiolucent Renal Stones
NCT06814834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stenting After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05738304 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life for Pediatric Urolithiasis
NCT06092203 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04869969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Intelligent Pressure-controlled Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT05201599 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA