Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High Density Renal Stones
NCT04346134 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 72
Last updated 2022-02-07
Summary
Several studies were conducted to compare extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) as treatment options for medium size lower caliceal high dense stones. However, no studies compared these options for non- lower polar stones.
In the present study the investigators will compare mini-PNL and SWL in treatment of non- lower polar, medium size, high dense renal stones in reference to the stone free rate and safety of the procedures.
Pre-operative evaluation including abdominal non-contrasted computed tomography will be performed for all patients. Patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups and will be treated by either mini-PNL or SWL. postoperative, patients will be followed by regularly for 3 months. the outcome of the procedures will be evaluated and compared between groups.
Conditions
- Renal Stone
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy
- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
mini-PNL
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy using miniature nephroscope. The procedure will be performed under general or spinal anesthesia under fluoroscopy guidance.
- PROCEDURE
-
SWL
Extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy using Dornier SII lithotripter. the procedure will be performed under sedoanalgesia, and fluoroscopy will be used for stone localization; for a maximum of 3 SWL session.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Al-Azhar University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-07-14
- Primary Completion
- 2020-12-01
- Completion
- 2021-03-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Efficacy of Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and Combined ESWL and ODT as Non-Invasive Modalities for Treating Small and Medium-Sized Radiolucent Renal Stones
NCT06814834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Alternating Bidirectional Versus The Standard Approach During Shock Wave Lithotripsy For Renal And Upper Lumbar Ureteric Stones
NCT03243682 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Energy Ramping Versus Fixed Dose ESWL
NCT07334236 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Visual Cystolitholapaxy in The Management of Patients Presenting With Calcular Acute Urinary Retention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT02594631 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Safety of Narrow Focus (F1) Versus Wide Focus (F3) of Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) for Renal Calculi
NCT04759599 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT03932370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Management of Lower Pole Renal Hard Stones ≤2 cm
NCT06120257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
(SWL) Versus (ODT) Versus Combined SWL And ODT For Radiolucent Stone
NCT03388060 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones
NCT06465784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laser Versus Ultrasonic Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Stones
NCT01922414 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultraslow Full-power SWL Versus Slow Power-ramping SWL in Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03763539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Extra-Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal and Upper Ureteral Stones in Adults Under Locally Infiltrate d Anaesthetics ; a Clinical Randomized Controlled Study
NCT06462573 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, Electroconductive and Electrohydraulic Types
NCT06144372 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Supine Mini-PCNL and Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) for Dense Lower Calyceal Stones (1-2 cm) in School-Age Pediatric Patients
NCT07345234 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus ESWL in the Management of Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT02658942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Ureteric Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03795545 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones
NCT02037906 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Prospective Observational Comparison of SMP and ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm in Children (IAU-04)
NCT04317443 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Efficacy of Intra-Ureteric Aminophylline Installation After Failed Stone Accessibility by Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy. Prospective Trial
NCT06728943 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Drainage After Flexible Ureterorenoscopy; Prospective Assessment of Perioperative Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life Through a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04643145 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA