Ureteral Stents Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Initial Urinary Drainage

NCT02055430 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90

Last updated 2014-04-23

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

To compare percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) versus double J stent (JJ) as an initial urinary drainage in children

Conditions

  • Children
  • Obstructive Uropathy
  • Acute Renal Failure
  • Ureteric Stones

Interventions

PROCEDURE

percutaneous nephrostomy insertion

The 1st arm was drained by PCN. This was performed under general anesthesia (GA) and fluoroscopic guidance.

PROCEDURE

bilateral double J ureteric stent

The 2nd arm was drained by bilateral JJ . This was performed under general anesthesia (GA) and fluoroscopic guidance.

PROCEDURE

Definitive stone management

(shockwave lithotripsy, chemodissolution therapy, ureteroscopy or open surgery) for clearance of stones.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohammed S ElSheemy, A professor · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Max Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-03-31
Primary Completion
2013-03-31
Completion
2013-09-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02055430 on ClinicalTrials.gov