Truness of Full Arch Impressions in All on x Cases
NCT07550725 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 11
Last updated 2026-05-07
Summary
This study aims to compare the trueness and precision of three impression methodologies photogrammetry, digital intraoral scanning with splinted scan bodies, and conventional open tray impressions in the context of the All-on-X treatment concept. This will provide valuable evidence for clinicians considering digital workflows for implant-supported prostheses. Does the use of photogrammetry and digital impression techniques with splinted scan bodies result in improved accuracy in implant position transfer in the All-on-X concept compared to conventional open tray impressions?
Conditions
- Truness of Impression Techniques in All on x Cases
- Trueness of Full Arch Implant Prosthesis Impression
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
photogrammetry based full arch impression
use of photogrammetry system to capture the positions of All on X implants digitally without physical impression material. This technique aims to achieve precise measurements and increase patient satisfaction
- DEVICE
-
Digital Impression Using Splinted Scan Bodies
Digital full-arch impression using splinted scan bodies connected with resin to enhance stability. An intraoral scanner captures the splinted assembly for framework fabrication. Accuracy and patient satisfaction will be evaluated.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional Open-Tray Implant Impression
Traditional full-arch open-tray impression using polyether or VPS material with splinted impression copings. This serves as the standard comparator for evaluating accuracy and patient satisfaction.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
October 6 University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 55 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-09-01
- Completion
- 2026-10-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Accuracy of Conventional Scan Bodies, Intra-oral Photogrammetry, and Calibrated Scan Flags in Full-Arch Implant Scanning
NCT07200440 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fully Versus Partially Guided Implants Placement: Measurement of Accuracy of Implant Position and Passivity of Superstructures.
NCT07174791 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Open Tray Versus Digital Impressions on the Passivity and Prosthetic Complications of Full Arch Screw-retained Prosthesis
NCT04848207 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Tooth Modified Scan Bodies as a Novel Technique
NCT06177782 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Scanning Technology on Internal Fit of Digitally Customized Intra-radicular Attachments
NCT07541625 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis
NCT04475913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Passivity of Full-Arch Co-Cr Maxillary Prostheses Using IOS
NCT07370701 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Navigated Photogrammetry Compared to Standard Stereophotogrammetry
NCT06506747 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Complete Digital Workflow for Construction of Full Arch Implant Supported Screw Retained Restoration
NCT06067334 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trueness of Full Arch Scans and Generated Digital Implant Models
NCT06281002 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Precision of Digital Impressions in Complete-Arch Implant Rehabilitation: Evaluation of Two Digital Techniques
NCT07211022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation in Implant Surgery for Full Arch Prosthesis
NCT06963242 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Scan Time and Prosthetic Complications of Intraoral Scanning Versus Intraoral Photogrammetry for Full-Arch Titanium Framework With Zirconia Overlay Implant Screw-Retained Prostheses
NCT07446790 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Precision of Three Different Scanbodies Used for Direct Digitalization Technique
NCT05790148 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Intraoral Scanning With and Without Prefabricated Landmarks Versus Conventional Impression Technique
NCT06592066 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Impression Technique in Mandibular Arch
NCT05770011 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Impressions, Intraoral Scanners and Digital Photogrammetry for Full-arch Implant Prosthesis.
NCT06570499 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-dimensional Accuracy of Direct Digital Scanning for All on Four Implants in Comparison to a Custom-made Verification Jig in Fully Edentulous Patients
NCT07106177 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Impressions Versus Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Supported Screw Retained Prosthesis
NCT05912725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Face Scanning on Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement in Fixed Implant Supported Maxillary Prostheses
NCT06001515 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Precision of Complete-arch Digital Implant Impressions With Intraoral Scanning Versus Photogrammetry
NCT05972148 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Integration of Facial , Intraoral Scanning and CBCT on Patient Satisfaction and Occlusion of Temporary, Permanent Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06846372 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Digital Workflow for Construction of Full Arch Implant Supported Screw Retained Restoration
NCT06332482 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Two Methods of Making Impressions for Complete-arch Implant Supported Fixed Prosthesis
NCT06343441 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Digital Implant Impression
NCT04627649 ·Status: UNKNOWN