Clinical Performance of Bioactive Bulk-Fill in Class II Restorations
NCT07547904 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2026-04-23
Summary
This prospective split-mouth clinical study aims to compare the clinical performance of a bioactive bulk-fill composite with a conventional microhybrid composite in Class II posterior restorations. In each participant, two comparable Class II cavities will be treated using different restorative approaches. In the experimental condition, a bioactive bulk-fill composite (Activa BioACTIVE Bulk Flow) will be placed at the gingival base and covered with a microhybrid composite (Filtek Z250). In the control condition, restorations will be completed entirely with the microhybrid composite (Filtek Z250).
Clinical performance will be evaluated according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Primary outcomes include marginal adaptation, retention, and overall clinical success of the restorations. Secondary outcomes include surface properties and marginal staining.
The split-mouth design allows direct intra-individual comparison, thereby minimizing inter-individual variability and increasing the reliability of the findings. The results of this study are expected to provide evidence on the effectiveness of bioactive bulk-fill composites in improving the clinical performance of posterior restorations.
Conditions
- Dental Caries
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Activa BioACTIVE Bulk Flow
Bioactive bulk-fill composite material used at the gingival base in Class II restorations.
- DEVICE
-
Filtek Z250
Conventional microhybrid composite used for full restoration in Class II cavities.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Bezmialem Vakif University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-02-05
- Primary Completion
- 2027-06-30
- Completion
- 2027-08-30
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Assessment of Giomer Based Technology Versus Smart Bioactive Restoration in Carious Class V Cavities
NCT05466461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Wear Resistance and Bioactivity of Self Cured Bioactive Resin Composite
NCT07262086 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations
NCT05499494 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Restorative vs GIC Modified Glass Ionomer in Restoration of Cervical Lesions: Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04363996 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using Snow Plow Versus Oscillating Packing Technique
NCT07033650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07003360 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT04152460 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative vs. RMGI in Class V: A Randomized Control Trial
NCT03771196 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Resin Composite Restorations
NCT05418400 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite Versus Conventionally Bonded Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions
NCT04888676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Sonic Fill and X-tra Fill in Clinical Performance
NCT04926883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two-Year Clinical Performance of Self-Cured Resin Composite in Comparison to Light-Cured Bioactive Resin Composite in Restoring Occlusal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT07480070 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations
NCT06183320 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Simplified-Shade Nano-Hybrid Composite With Full-Coverage Silane Coating and High-Performance Pulverized Fillers
NCT07334509 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flowable Resin Composite: Two-Year Clinical Performance in Class I Restorations
NCT07330193 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Bioactive Composites vs RMGI for Proximal Cavities in Primary Molars
NCT07561216 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Treatment in Cariously Exposed Teeth
NCT06802549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars
NCT06000085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Assess the Clinical Success of Root Canal Treatment Using Novel Obturation Material.
NCT06312085 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of a Flowable Bulk Fill Composite Versus a Highly Viscous Glass-ionomer Cement in Primary Molars
NCT06166160 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns
NCT06348979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity Using Bioactive Cement Incementation of Indirect Composite Blocks
NCT04557657 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
The Study Aims to Compare the Effectiveness of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-containing Adhesives vs Conventional Universal Adhesives on the Clinical Performance Composite Restorations Through Promoting Dentin Remineralization After Selective Caries Removal Over a Two-year Follow-up
NCT06990945 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA