Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations
NCT06183320 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 38
Last updated 2026-05-15
Summary
Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controlled, parallel, double-blinded, with two groups, that aims to evaluate the best application strategy when using a flowable bulk fill composite (Opus Bulk Fill Flow APS, FGM, Brazil) in class II cavities. Volunteers will be selected and recruited, following inclusion criteria and pre-established exclusion criteria. All volunteers will be informed and sign a term of clarification and consent. 38 enrolled patients will receive 76 Class II dental restorations, made in two different ways, one from each experimental group. Authors will perform restorations with an incremental composite (Vittra APS - FGM) associated with a bulk-fill flowable composite (Opus Bulk Fill Flow APS - FGM), in class II cavities, exposing (Group BP) or not (Group IP) the bulk fill flowable composite to the cavosurface angle on the proximal wall of the restorations. In both groups, Opus Bulk Fill Flow APS resin will be used in the bulk technique with up to 5mm depth increments, leaving 1 mm in the occlusal for incremental Vittra APS composite resin. Immediate post-operative tooth sensitivity will be evaluated after one week. Restorations will be evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, fractures, staining or recurrent caries, using FDI scores. To determine in which group each tooth will be enrolled, the authors will randomize the teeth.
Conditions
- Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Restoration with Incremental Composite in Proximal Wall
Proximo-occlusal lesions will receive the self-etch adhesive system Ambar Universal APS with selective acid etching, according to the manufacturers instrucions. Then, proximal wall will be completely restored with Vittra APS composite resin, using the triangular incremental traditional technique described for classe II restorations. Then, Opus Bulk Fill Flow APS will be used in the bulk technique with up to 5mm depth increments, leaving 1 mm in the occlusal for incremental Vittra APS composite resin, that will be used with the traditional incremental technique. Both composites will be light-cured with VALO light-cure unit (Ultradent, USA) for 40 seconds.
- PROCEDURE
-
Restoration with Bulk Fill Composite in Proximal Wall
Proximo-occlusal lesions will receive the self-etch adhesive system Ambar Universal APS with selective acid etching, according to the manufacturers instrucions. Then, Opus Bulk Fill Flow APS resin will be used in the bulk technique with up to 5mm depth increments, leaving 1 mm in the occlusal for incremental Vittra APS composite resin, that will be used with the traditional incremental technique. Both composites will be light-cured with VALO light-cure unit (Ultradent, USA) for 40 seconds.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universidade Federal Fluminense
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
MARCOS O BARCELEIRO, PhD · Universidade Federal Fluminense
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-08-05
- Primary Completion
- 2020-06-02
- Completion
- 2026-05-08
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Assessment of L-PRF, Nanohydroxyapatite Combined With L-PRF Using Pulpotomy in Mature Mandibular First Molars
NCT06613932 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flowable Resin Composite: Two-Year Clinical Performance in Class I Restorations
NCT07330193 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Stainless Steel Crowns Versus Bulkfill Composite Resin for Restoring Primary Molars After Endodontic Treatment
NCT03186950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria.
NCT05180903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Success of Bulk Fil Composite Versus Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer in Primary Class II Molars
NCT06235489 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods
NCT06227390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns
NCT06348979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars
NCT06000085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
NCT03283280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Repair of Proximal Restoration Resin Bulk Fill. Clinical Trial
NCT05013866 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injection-Molding Vs. Incremental Packing of Resin Composite in Cavitated Posterior Teeth
NCT05020093 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of the Outcome of Partial and Full Pulpotomy in Irreversible Pulpits
NCT05279820 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Prognostic Factors on the Success of Full Pulpotomy in Permanent Mature Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT06597487 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect Of Different Lining Materials in Stepwise Excavation
NCT01730287 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Partial Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Teeth With Signs and Symptoms of Irreversible Pulpits
NCT04870398 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Pulpotomy Procedure Using NeoMTA Plus in Permanent Teeth With Carious Exposure
NCT03522051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of I-PRF Versus Nano MTA Combined with I-PRF Scaffold in Vital Pulp Therapy in Mature Mandibular First Molars
NCT06640205 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Pulpotomy Using Neoputty Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Versus Pulpectomy Using Endoflas In Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06922578 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Bulk-Fill Composite of Posterior Restorations
NCT03230604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Partial and Complete Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Using MTA
NCT04650113 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Clinical Performance of a Flowable Bulk Fill Composite Versus a Highly Viscous Glass-ionomer Cement in Primary Molars
NCT06166160 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Magnification and Clinical Experience on the Outcome of Pulpotomy in Mature Adult Teeth
NCT06231290 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
PRF Pulpotomy Using Different Bioceramic Materials in Permanent Molars
NCT04784949 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA