Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative vs. RMGI in Class V: A Randomized Control Trial
NCT03771196 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2018-12-11
Summary
Clinical performance of bioactive restorative material versus Resin Modifeid Glass Ionoer (RMGI) in class V o will be evaluated over 12 months using United State Public Health Criteria (USHPS) clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations
Conditions
- Dental Restoration Failure
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Bioactive Restorative Material
enhanced RMGIs with an ionic resin matrix, a shock-absorbing resin component, and bioactive fillers that mimic the physical and chemical properties of natural teeth
- OTHER
-
Resin-modified glass ionomer
Enhanced glass ionomer with acceptable mechanical properties and esthtic properties
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2022-08-31
- Completion
- 2022-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Assessment of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Cavities: A Clinical Trial
NCT06673888 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Restorative vs GIC Modified Glass Ionomer in Restoration of Cervical Lesions: Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04363996 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compariing a Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant To A Conventional Resin
NCT04052802 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations
NCT05499494 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Wear Resistance and Bioactivity of Self Cured Bioactive Resin Composite
NCT07262086 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite Versus Conventionally Bonded Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions
NCT04888676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Endocrowns Fabricated From Two Hybrid Ceramic Materials on Endodontically Treated Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07005167 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Sealants vs Conventional Sealants in Permanent Molars
NCT03779893 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Reminerlization Potential of Innovative Biomimetic Material in Caries White Spot Lesions
NCT03823612 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
One Year Clinical Performance of Self Adhesive Giomer Containing Flowable Composite in Restoring Class V Cavities
NCT04944485 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Nano-Bioactive Glass Combined With I-PRF Scaffold in Vital Pulp Treatments in Mandibular Molars With Closed Apices
NCT05876520 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Nano Bioactive Glass Combined With i-PRF Scaffold in Vital Pulp Treatments
NCT05902936 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns Versus Conventional Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05337358 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT06260644 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Self Etch Giomer Based Fissure Sealant
NCT05336162 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of the Incidence of Caries in Pits and Fissures Sealed With Bioactive Sealant Compared to Fluoride Releasing Resin Based Pit and Fissure Sealant
NCT03628729 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
NCT03283280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radio-graphic Evaluation of Non-staining Bio-active Bio-ceramic (Neo MTA 2) in Revascularization
NCT06637761 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Incidence of Postoperative Pain After Using Different Types of Sealers
NCT05841290 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of the Indirect Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth
NCT04561167 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria.
NCT05180903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Role of Biodentine in Class V Dental Lesions on Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03304184 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Performance Of Cervical Restorations Using Nitric Acid and Mineral Enriched Adhesive Versus Phosphoric Acid and Universal Adhesive
NCT05928533 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods
NCT06227390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA